I personally think that this case is less clear cut than the one in Ferguson. On one hand, this guy never physically posed any threat to the officers, and he never put the officers in any danger. On the other hand, once he resisted arrests by police officers, then all bets are off. I don't understand why he resisted arrest in the first place, considering he had had 30 prior arrests. He knew the drill. You fight for civil rights and argue over evidence in the court of the law, or better yet, with the lawmakers. You do not argue with police officers when they are enforcing laws. That is where you need to obey the authorities.
他们应该像Ferguson案件一样,公布大陪审团过程的前后和证据。
I personally think that this case is less clear cut than the one in Ferguson. On one hand, this guy never physically posed any threat to the officers, and he never put the officers in any danger. On the other hand, once he resisted arrests by police officers, then all bets are off. I don't understand why he resisted arrest in the first place, considering he had had 30 prior arrests. He knew the drill. You fight for civil rights and argue over evidence in the court of the law, or better yet, with the lawmakers. You do not argue with police officers when they are enforcing laws. That is where you need to obey the authorities.
所有跟帖:
• 顶你,没跟那个案子,听起来不是那么简单。。 -桃子苹果- ♀ (164 bytes) () 12/05/2014 postreply 17:32:35
• 在警察执法的时候, 与警察争辩确实不是一个明智之举。 但是不代表说你就因此 -再见二丁目- ♀ (663 bytes) () 12/05/2014 postreply 17:43:33
• 短片是众多evidence之一。还有许多evidence 你我没有看到。以此质疑大陪审团的结果, -vest2005- ♀ (99 bytes) () 12/05/2014 postreply 17:52:14
• 我也想看看相关的证据。 我对刑法很感兴趣。 但我觉得我是做不了 -再见二丁目- ♀ (142 bytes) () 12/05/2014 postreply 17:55:06
• 检查官肯定也不容易做的。天天跟辩护律师打交道:) -vest2005- ♀ (437 bytes) () 12/05/2014 postreply 18:12:01
• 哈哈, 从头做起。 我还是喜欢transactional work, -再见二丁目- ♀ (648 bytes) () 12/05/2014 postreply 18:21:53