I personally would not endorse her way of living. Neither would I impose my moral judgement on her. However, I do think she represents a lost generation, perhaps Hip Pop generation. Perhaps, to them, life itself is randomness, without deep meanings. The only thing that makes sense is pursuing pleasure at the moment. Do you really think they are free? From a Christian point of view, we are not turely free, since we are always the slaves of our original sins. I personally believe the fact that she does not accept her boyfriend is neither because she looks down on her boyfriend's wealth nor because she is tired of his moral value. I think she behaved that way more because of her rebellious nature. A rebel without cause.
A rebel without cause. She sounds like WeiHui, the author of Sha
所有跟帖:
•
爱咋咋是她的人生信条。人生没有教科书和标准答案
-acme-
♀
(292 bytes)
()
12/30/2007 postreply
09:58:34
•
特欣赏她的这种“爱咋咋”的态度!
-蓝色记忆-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/30/2007 postreply
10:06:30
•
It is pretty daring.她要为爱咋咋付出很大代价,研究工作
-acme-
♀
(84 bytes)
()
12/30/2007 postreply
10:11:41
•
需要有高IQ做BACKUP.
-miejueshitai-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/30/2007 postreply
10:15:30
•
她的心态很好,而她的智商也使得她能在游刃于情感游戏间同获得学业上的成功!
-蓝色记忆-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/30/2007 postreply
10:18:49
•
I am just reasoning the phenomena
-lilly1234-
♀
(1068 bytes)
()
12/30/2007 postreply
10:29:00
•
Not meant to argue, but I happen to think her rebel is
-acme-
♀
(249 bytes)
()
12/30/2007 postreply
11:21:17
•
Interesting, I think it is more of a purpose without purpose
-lilly1234-
♀
(700 bytes)
()
12/30/2007 postreply
11:40:31
•
exactly
-nature17-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/30/2007 postreply
11:49:25