Just curious.
Nothing offensive. 不是吵架帖哦.
•
看什么标准了,钱怎么多都不够花。
-Oona-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/11/2007 postreply
15:27:07
•
我觉得一般拿工资的不管挣多少都不能叫Rich,只能说小康.
-chinesebuns-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/11/2007 postreply
16:17:59
•
well, for quite lawyers in the NYC, as a corp counsel, they
-榕树下-
♀
(38 bytes)
()
12/11/2007 postreply
16:51:10
•
如果是INVESTMENT BANKER呢?他们可能不只是小康了.
-disodoso-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/11/2007 postreply
16:53:05
•
同意。真正有钱的人都不是靠工资生活的了。
-shacha-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/12/2007 postreply
06:47:02
•
"true wealth’ starts at a hefty $10 million"- refered to THE FIL
-gzlady-
♀
(962 bytes)
()
12/11/2007 postreply
17:28:17
•
refered to "THE FILTHY RICH", US Today, 17 June
-gzlady-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/11/2007 postreply
17:30:42
•
呵呵,硅谷的好像后边还得加一两个零
-clipmom-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/11/2007 postreply
19:10:08
•
看来大家的标准都很高:).那FANFAN的BF到底算不算有钱人呢?
-disodoso-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/11/2007 postreply
20:33:10
•
my bf's net income is $40 m. not super rich, but rich
-fanfan88-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/12/2007 postreply
06:51:05
•
$40M per year?
-disodoso-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/12/2007 postreply
06:53:22
•
You are very good at lying.
-mooncutie812-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/12/2007 postreply
07:55:13
•
If u want to lie, at least make up a believable number.
-mooncutie812-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/12/2007 postreply
08:00:17
•
有一种衡量标准,就是看在没有任何收入的情况下还能维持多久现在的生活水平
-嘻嘻~-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/12/2007 postreply
04:49:47