给警察助威前，看看grand jury到底为什么裁决no indictment。都是那个DA搞得龟。

Prosecutors left off the table a criminal charge that would have allowed a Staten Island grand jury to indict the cop who killed Eric Garner — even if the panel believed the officer didn’t intend to choke him to death, WNBC reported Friday.

It’s called reckless endangerment and all a majority on the grand jury would have needed to do is agree that Officer Daniel Pantaleo’s actions — clearly visible on a horrific cell phone video obtained by The Daily News — figured in Garner’s death.

But they never got the chance.

“District Attorney Daniel Donovan only asked grand jurors to consider manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide charges,” WNBC reported Friday.

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/nypd-commissioner-bill-bratton-defends-de-blasio-article-1.2034559

所有跟帖： 

• 再加一个point，chokehold是纽约警察禁止的手段，用chokehold不符合protocol。 -PAS- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/05/2014 postreply 20:50:35

• It was a headlock, not a chokehold. NY media clarified it a few -vest2005- ♀ (721 bytes) () 12/06/2014 postreply 05:21:21

• 再加一篇，看看前新泽西州supreme court Judge Andrew P. Napolitano怎么说。这里的cop w -PAS- ♀ (2134 bytes) () 12/05/2014 postreply 21:08:00