大家听听她的口语怎样,能不能找到砖。
所有跟帖:
•
Yiyun Li's info.
-NewVoice-
♀
(1539 bytes)
()
09/07/2011 postreply
16:14:53
•
谢谢分享,佩服李翊雲的写作才华。
-珈玥-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
09/08/2011 postreply
10:33:30
•
很好, 不知道是不是prepared speech。 不过不像native speaker。没找到砖。
-jingbeiboy-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/07/2011 postreply
16:26:24
•
She came to the United States in 1996
-NewVoice-
♀
(177 bytes)
()
09/07/2011 postreply
16:35:57
•
她的水平的确很高,但是既然能听出不是NATIVE,还是试着挑砖。
-菜鸟抄股-
♂
(224 bytes)
()
09/07/2011 postreply
16:47:36
•
"road" 比较明显.其它听不大出来。
-NewVoice-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
09/07/2011 postreply
17:29:22
•
I’d say she’s a language genius too, although she might need to
-浮上来冒个小泡-
♀
(359 bytes)
()
09/07/2011 postreply
17:47:17
•
Her spoken communication is as good as her writing .. 只是有一处没听懂:
-billnet-
♂
(178 bytes)
()
09/07/2011 postreply
19:26:25
•
isn't an exotic or a different place
-beautifulwind-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
09/07/2011 postreply
19:48:24
•
is an exotic or a different place.
-好学又好问-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
09/07/2011 postreply
20:05:53
•
别的同学听得是什么呢?新声姐,网上有script吗?
-beautifulwind-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
09/07/2011 postreply
20:25:04
•
我觉得是isn't
-非文学青年-
♀
(74 bytes)
()
09/07/2011 postreply
20:48:43
•
你听得是什么?我听得确实是是isn't。在 how china 之前有not。
-beautifulwind-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
09/07/2011 postreply
20:51:19
•
听着也象isn't。
-非文学青年-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
09/07/2011 postreply
20:55:37
•
Sorry, I can't find it. 根据上下文, 应该是 "isn't"
-NewVoice-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
09/08/2011 postreply
03:47:30
•
看来我听错了
-好学又好问-
♀
(238 bytes)
()
09/08/2011 postreply
07:02:29
•
No, I think you were right, it should be 'an' espcially accordin
-菜鸟抄股-
♂
(134 bytes)
()
09/08/2011 postreply
07:33:41
•
菜鸟把自己绕晕了,哈哈。
-非文学青年-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
09/08/2011 postreply
08:39:50
•
偶是晕了。。。彻底的那种。。。
-菜鸟抄股-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/08/2011 postreply
09:12:59
•
我也晕了,你是对的。
-非文学青年-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
09/08/2011 postreply
12:48:14
•
IS as in ISn't是重读音节。
-beautifulwind-
♀
(3125 bytes)
()
09/08/2011 postreply
07:44:59
•
我听着也是isn't,但是听不出来后面跟an. Isn't exotic or a different place 通吧?
-toast2011-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
09/08/2011 postreply
09:04:52
•
语感口气感真好呀,不过既然是到了一定年纪过来,口音是一定有的。
-小麦熊-
♀
(490 bytes)
()
09/08/2011 postreply
09:52:39
•
我倾向于这种说法
-billnet-
♂
(182 bytes)
()
09/08/2011 postreply
11:26:00
•
Thanks! Me too! : )
-小麦熊-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
09/08/2011 postreply
11:27:46
•
我当时也是这么听的。。
-好学又好问-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
09/08/2011 postreply
12:07:53
•
我倒戈过来了
-非文学青年-
♀
(49 bytes)
()
09/08/2011 postreply
12:47:46
•
Me too. I am convinced. Thanks, everyone.
-NewVoice-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
09/08/2011 postreply
13:25:17
•
我也confused了。不想从上下文推断,因为上下文推断两者都会解释得通的。
-beautifulwind-
♀
(328 bytes)
()
09/08/2011 postreply
15:35:31
•
咱们给她发个E吧,问问她到底说啥了,哈哈哈
-小麦熊-
♀
(242 bytes)
()
09/08/2011 postreply
16:05:49
•
哈哈,似乎要么是她重读错了,要么是文法错了。不纠结了。连她英语这么好,都引起歧义,
-beautifulwind-
♀
(92 bytes)
()
09/08/2011 postreply
16:17:14
•
对呀,it's fun to make mistakes. We learned a lot!
-小麦熊-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
09/08/2011 postreply
16:18:39