Although the prevailing supposition has been that it is too hot for microorganisms to survive deep below the Earth's surface,some scientists argue that there are living communities of microorganisms there that have been cut off from surface life for millions of years.These scientists base their argument on the discovery of living microorganisms in samples of material that were taken from holes drilled as deep as 1.74 miles.The scientists' argument depends on which of the following assumptions?
A. The microorganisms brought up were of a species that is related to those previously know to science.
B.No holes have been drilled into the Earth's surface to a distance deeper than 1.74 miles.
C.The microorganisms did not come from surface soil that came into contact with the drilling equipment.
D.The stratum from which the samples came has been below the surface of the Earth ever since the Earth came into existence.
E.The temperature at the bottom of the holes drilled was not significantly hotter than that of the hottest spots on the Earth's surface.
我选的答案是D,但是正确答案是C,也是怎么都想不通原因.请逻辑好的同学们给点拨一下.
第2题...请逻辑好的高手给解释一下.
所有跟帖:
•
回复:第2题...请逻辑好的高手给解释一下.
-我是帅哥我怕谁-
♂
(545 bytes)
()
01/01/2010 postreply
17:47:35
•
我这题的答案是D,我认为D也是非常有道理的
-陶陶乐,乐陶陶-
♀
(215 bytes)
()
01/01/2010 postreply
17:54:58
•
回复:我这题的答案是D,我认为D也是非常有道理的
-我是帅哥我怕谁-
♂
(65 bytes)
()
01/01/2010 postreply
18:19:45
•
回复:回复:我这题的答案是D,我认为D也是非常有道理的
-陶陶乐,乐陶陶-
♀
(66 bytes)
()
01/01/2010 postreply
18:49:52
•
不能选D,这里有一个知识点.
-ntotl-
♂
(229 bytes)
()
01/01/2010 postreply
18:59:08
•
回复:不能选D,这里有一个知识点.
-陶陶乐,乐陶陶-
♀
(168 bytes)
()
01/01/2010 postreply
19:06:29
•
出题的人可能把它作为"常识"处理了.
-ntotl-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
01/01/2010 postreply
19:08:20
•
更加说明我的"常识"太少了,...
-陶陶乐,乐陶陶-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
01/01/2010 postreply
19:10:36
•
我又看了一下,从逻辑上,答案d也不能支持.
-ntotl-
♂
(50 bytes)
()
01/01/2010 postreply
19:13:10
•
你说的没错
-陶陶乐,乐陶陶-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
01/01/2010 postreply
19:17:19
•
即使答案D是正确的,也只不过是已陈述事实的补充,而不是另一个假设条件.
-ntotl-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
01/01/2010 postreply
20:17:15