A drop of water reflects...

本帖于 2015-06-23 06:07:31 时间, 由普通用户 走马读人 编辑

A cause of a wrong word "rubblish" in Beijing is analyzed by  3 linguists and me, as:  
A  by phonotactic,  B  by eggcorn-y reshaping influenced by "rubble."
C  phonological    D. effect of Echoic memory
Which is  more reasonable, which is mine?

所有跟帖: 

B? -南山松- 给 南山松 发送悄悄话 南山松 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/22/2015 postreply 17:58:07

you may be right, my guess is not B, I do know the trick of rubb -走马读人- 给 走马读人 发送悄悄话 走马读人 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/22/2015 postreply 20:37:09

rubble vs. rubbish, since it is by chinese, I guess it is by laj -走马读人- 给 走马读人 发送悄悄话 走马读人 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/22/2015 postreply 20:39:06

C? -郁金香花园- 给 郁金香花园 发送悄悄话 郁金香花园 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/28/2015 postreply 23:20:05

thx, mine is D -走马读人- 给 走马读人 发送悄悄话 走马读人 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/29/2015 postreply 13:09:25

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!