你错了！

Obama said “I don't believe that another round of tax breaks for millionaires will bring good jobs to our shores, or pay down our deficit.” But what he actually would do is to increase tax for people who earn $250,000.  That’s why I think that he confused millionaires and people who earn $250,000.

You are confused. “millionaires (those with investments of $1 million or more)” and people who earn $250,000 are not the same group of people. If you do survey of people who earn $250,000, I do not believe that you can get 60%以上人也支持给自己加税.

所有跟帖： 

• 呵呵，当地是谁错了！ -徒劳- ♂ (2724 bytes) () 09/09/2012 postreply 17:28:51

• Who tells you 年收入25万以上的人他的净资产会在100万以上? -Chris20119- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/09/2012 postreply 17:33:53

• Commen sense. 你承认你把millionaire 的含义搞错了吧？ -徒劳- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/09/2012 postreply 17:46:11

• Your commen sense 完全是无稽之谈。 -Chris20119- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/09/2012 postreply 17:49:38

• 好吧，让数字说话。这你该相信了吧！ -徒劳- ♂ (62348 bytes) () 09/09/2012 postreply 18:13:09

• 还是不相信。四五十万，上百万的人把我们二十五万的平均了。 -g18- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/09/2012 postreply 19:42:59

• 其实还有一点要搞清的是。。。 -徒劳- ♂ (123 bytes) () 09/09/2012 postreply 20:02:18

• 恰好相反，没三百万以上的人根本不好意思叫自己百万富翁。 -g18- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/09/2012 postreply 20:15:56

• 自己叫和别人叫不一样吧 -徒劳- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/09/2012 postreply 21:14:33

• 你不得要点。我建议你读所得税的历史事实。 -Chris20119- ♂ (2695 bytes) () 09/09/2012 postreply 20:26:58

• 是你不得要点。还在把财产和收入混在一起 -徒劳- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/09/2012 postreply 20:41:52

• 人家根本就没提财产, 是你把财产和收入混在一起。是你不得要点。 -michigan007- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/10/2012 postreply 06:23:04