The same source says there is no consistent evidence

Since the first report, suggesting an association between residential electric and magnetic fields and childhood cancer, notably leukaemia, was published in 1979, dozens of studies have examined this association. Overall, for the vast majority of children who are exposed to residential ELF magnetic fields less than 0.4 microtesla, there is little evidence of any increased risk for leukaemia. There is no evidence that electric fields are associated with childhood leukaemia, and there is no consistent relationship between childhood brain tumours or other childhood solid tumours and residential ELF electric and magnetic fields. However, pooled analyses of data from a number of well-conducted studies show a fairly consistent statistical association between childhood leukaemia and power-frequency residential magnetic field strengths above 0.4 microtesla, with an approximately two-fold increase in risk. This is unlikely to be due to chance, but may be affected by selection bias. Therefore this association between childhood leukemia and high residential magnetic field strengths was judged limited evidence for excess cancer risk in exposed humans.

There is no consistent evidence that residential or occupational exposures of adults are related to excess risks of cancer at any site, although in one Swedish study combined residential and occupational exposures were associated with a significantly increased risk for all leukaemia subtypes except chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Evidence for excess cancer risks of all other kinds, in children and in adults, as a result of exposure to ELF electric and magnetic fields was considered inadequate.

所有跟帖: 

定义为2b是因为儿童白血病 -arrwyn- 给 arrwyn 发送悄悄话 arrwyn 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/07/2014 postreply 15:32:45

电磁场与电磁波是两回事。 -26484915- 给 26484915 发送悄悄话 26484915 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/07/2014 postreply 15:35:15

别咬文嚼字了,说的就是 Extremely Low-Frequency electromagnetic field -arrwyn- 给 arrwyn 发送悄悄话 arrwyn 的博客首页 (81 bytes) () 06/07/2014 postreply 15:40:48

拉倒吧。你什么时候听说过地磁辐射? -26484915- 给 26484915 发送悄悄话 26484915 的博客首页 (441 bytes) () 06/07/2014 postreply 15:46:21

那是因为你搞不清楚地磁辐射DC和电磁辐射AC的差别 -arrwyn- 给 arrwyn 发送悄悄话 arrwyn 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/07/2014 postreply 15:48:06

回复:那是因为你搞不清楚地磁辐射DC和电磁辐射AC的差别 -26484915- 给 26484915 发送悄悄话 26484915 的博客首页 (42 bytes) () 06/07/2014 postreply 16:00:28

发电和输电用的是ac field,地磁是dc,差别就在这里,致癌也在这里 -arrwyn- 给 arrwyn 发送悄悄话 arrwyn 的博客首页 (221 bytes) () 06/07/2014 postreply 16:06:02

你是文科生吧。怎么就信这些天方夜谭呢? -相对强度- 给 相对强度 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 06/07/2014 postreply 16:09:56

物理学家曾经用超高压的(上百万伏),近距离的对细胞照射几个月,别说产生癌症, -相对强度- 给 相对强度 发送悄悄话 (97 bytes) () 06/07/2014 postreply 16:13:27

台湾的新闻报道过,高压电线附近很多人得了癌症。 -焚琴煮鹤.- 给 焚琴煮鹤. 发送悄悄话 焚琴煮鹤. 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 07/15/2014 postreply 20:30:18

我贴的那句话都说了static field是group3,说的是电器和发电机造成的ac field是2b,是潜在致癌物 -arrwyn- 给 arrwyn 发送悄悄话 arrwyn 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/07/2014 postreply 15:50:01

你看看这个。 -26484915- 给 26484915 发送悄悄话 26484915 的博客首页 (371 bytes) () 06/07/2014 postreply 15:56:39

唉,懂物理的人,想想就知道,低频辐射是不可能导致癌症的,就跟人空手不能飞一样。 -相对强度- 给 相对强度 发送悄悄话 (104 bytes) () 06/07/2014 postreply 16:04:12

不久前问过一位退休oncologist 肿瘤医生关于家电还有 -爱歌我去- 给 爱歌我去 发送悄悄话 (295 bytes) () 06/07/2014 postreply 18:44:15

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!