发现底下LZ789654的这段文出自GMAT的一段阅读推理问题，

发现底下LZ789654的这段文出自GMAT的一段阅读推理问题，网上有不少人在探讨多重选择答案哪个对。不妨你也试试看选那个：

Some environmentalists question the prudence of exploiting features of the environment, arguing that there are no economic benefits to be gained from forests, mountains, or wetlands that no longer exist. Many environmentalists claim that because nature has intrinsic value it would be wrong to destroy such features of the environment, even if the economic costs of doing so were outweighed by the economic costs of not doing so.

Which one of the following can be logically inferred
from the passage?
(A) It is economically imprudent to exploit features
of the environment.
(B) Some environmentalists appeal to a
noneconomic justification in questioning the
defensibility of exploiting features of the
environment.
(C) Most environmentalists appeal to economic
reasons in questioning the defensibility of
exploiting features of the environment.
(D) Many environmentalists provide only a
noneconomic justification in questioning the
defensibility of exploiting features of the
environment.
(E) Even if there is no economic reason for
protecting the environment, there is a sound
noneconomic justification for doing so. .

所有跟帖： 

• 选A的点这里 -水中捞月- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/24/2010 postreply 11:00:27

• 选B的点这里 -水中捞月- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/24/2010 postreply 11:00:55

• 选C的点这里 -水中捞月- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/24/2010 postreply 11:01:17

• 选D的点这里 -水中捞月- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/24/2010 postreply 11:01:38

• 选E的点这里 -水中捞月- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/24/2010 postreply 11:02:04

• 看俺的译文点这里：谢谢。 -水中捞月- ♂ (419 bytes) () 06/24/2010 postreply 11:32:36

• 问好，谢谢分享。周末快乐。 -紫君- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/25/2010 postreply 12:47:11