前公司挨踢部门加强安全，公司有需要的雇员全部配备爱疯，取替少数以前配备的安卓，不再配备安卓疯。爱疯的安全性是比较坚强的。有需要的雇员一般是头头，和ON Call 职能的。实际上RTO的安排下，几乎所有的雇员到变成ON CALL了。因工作时间你必须保持在线 ON Line，就是你的工作电脑/手机必须开通的，有电邮或短信必须及时回复。公司惯例早晨9-10点钟前需要ON Line 有个动静，否则中午12点前不吭声的在家办公雇员的要启动HR执行WELL CHECK程序。因为近2-3年有3位450+岁的同事S在了家里。有位未婚单身男一周后才被HR 通知他外城的姐姐报警WELL CHECK发现。这个一般是要尽量先通知家人亲友。实在不通时HR才最后直接报警。所以可能是几天的时间。另外1男1女是同住的家人发现的。40多岁的女的因为不到50，她的退休金贡献是不能被家人拿回来的。但应该没有多少钱。有3倍（或自费升级到5倍）50万顶的生命保险留给受益（家）人。
扯远了，回归技术正题。例如安卓/三星银河有一个Extend Unlock功能，用户可选择设置的蓝牙耳机或运动手表链接时自动解锁，绕过更安全指纹和脸谱解锁（Finger Print / Face ID）。也就是说你听这个耳机，或使用这个运动表时，手机是解锁状态的4小时，可以直接查看。
这显然是有安全的漏洞的。但是在某些户外运动时时Extend Unlock功能很有帮助的灵活。如跑步或自行车时查看地图路径Trail map，指纹解锁会受到汗液或痕迹的干扰，脸谱也受到太阳镜和或头盔的干扰。不是说就不工作了。擦干一下手指再指纹解锁，摘下太阳镜和或头盔再面相解锁，还是完全工作的。不方便，基本上你需要停下来站稳查看。
爱疯为了确保安全，不提供这个“灵活”。
However, based on Apple's long-standing policies and the current state of iOS, the direct answer is:
No, it is extremely unlikely that the iPhone 17 (or any iPhone in the near future) will have an "extended unlock" feature like many Android phones.
Here’s a detailed breakdown of why:
1. The Fundamental Difference: "Extended Unlock" vs. "On-Device Intelligence"
-
On Android: Features like "Extend unlock" or "Smart Lock" allow you to bypass the lock screen under certain conditions (like being at a trusted location or connected to a trusted device). This is a convenience feature that temporarily disables core security.
-
On iPhone (iOS): Apple's approach is different. Instead of bypassing the lock screen, it uses on-device intelligence to make security less intrusive while keeping it always active. The phone is never truly "unlocked."
-
iOS 16 and later: Features like "Face ID with a Mask" and unlocking while lying down improve convenience without disabling the lock screen.
-
iOS 18's New Feature (Expected Fall 2024): A feature tentatively called "Unlock and Stay Unlocked" has been discovered in beta versions. This is the closest an iPhone may get. It appears to allow the phone to remain unlocked only when it is stationary, on a known surface (like a desk at home or office), and in a familiar location. The moment you pick it up to move, it would immediately re-lock. This keeps security as the top priority.
2. Apple's Philosophy on Security
Apple places a very high priority on user privacy and security. The secure enclave (the chip that handles biometric data) is designed to require authentication for accessing most sensitive data. Introducing a feature that bypasses this based on potentially spoofable signals (like GPS location or Bluetooth) would be a significant departure from their "security-first" design principle.
3. The "Trusted Location" Problem
Features that use GPS for a "trusted location" are notoriously unreliable. GPS signals can be weak, spoofed, or have a wide radius, making it a security risk Apple has been unwilling to take.
Comparison Table
Conclusion
While the iPhone 17 will undoubtedly have new features, a direct clone of Android's "Extend Unlock" is not one of them. You should expect Apple to continue its path of enhancing convenience within its strict security model, likely with more intelligent contextual awareness like the "Unlock and Stay Unlocked" feature rumored for iOS 18, rather than a full bypass of the lock screen.
