这个Cut是因为保留老桥，去掉新桥的人行道和自行车道，

In 2019, the Maryland Transportation Authority instead voted to approve a $463 million dollar contract that did not have state funding for the bike and pedestrian paths.

The MTA said it offered to turn the old bridge over to Charles County, "but county officials declined the offer."

The advocates suing now say they believe the change of plans, while approved by the MTA, did not meet the rigorous environmental and transportation impact studies required. They argue since those studies were not done to the same extent as the original project, the old bridge should be kept and turned into a pedestrian and cycling bridge.

"It’s clear from our perspective that Maryland did not do the environmental homework and the studies that they needed to do to make this change by eliminating the bicycle and pedestrian paths, rights of ways on the new Nice Bridge," Brinkley said.

所有跟帖： 

• 只减人行道和自行车道，也不可能节省那么多造价；至少这座桥没尔等所说的一再追加造价和延长工期。 -法眼- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/02/2024 postreply 14:55:38

• 这个是， -胡雪盐8- ♂ (47 bytes) () 05/02/2024 postreply 14:57:49

• 这个河道也不浅，与巴尔地摩这座桥的水深相差无几了。 -法眼- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/02/2024 postreply 15:06:31

• 同时，我可以告诉你，老桥demolished；而且，老桥主桥墩的水下部分都demolished了。 -法眼- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/02/2024 postreply 16:34:55