以前我以为西方保护自然是靠政府和环保主义者; 看了历史发现,也要感谢热爱自然不自私的有钱人

来源: 咏月 2021-11-13 09:37:32 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (1962 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ 咏月 ] 在 2021-11-13 09:41:09 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.

比如说我们上个月hiking去的那个Phleger Estate, 地产主人本人就是热爱红木森林的,不想让它被商业破坏,只要了很低的价格出售 ;拯救红木森林的基金会共同努力凑了大部分的钱, 而且游说富豪买了其中的宅子,终于实现保护红木森林并对公众开放! 

 

美国国家公园网站上的介绍:

Phleger Estate
 
Enjoy a verdant redwood forest reborn here at the southern tip of the Golden Gate National Parks. This tranquil park was once severely logged and century-old redwood stumps and remnants of steam mills are still in evidence. But along its miles of trails and tumbling creeks, second-growth redwoods and firs are rising again.


History of Phleger Estate
In 1990, Mary Elena Phleger, widowed in 1984 and determined to keep her family's estate intact, offered Peninsula Open Space Trust (POST) the opportunity to make it so. With only 5 paid staff and an exceptionally tight deadline, POST embarked on an ambitious fundraising, lobbying and public awareness campaign. POST staff and volunteers worked feverishly, drawing hundreds of letters of support from local and state officials. This outpouring of community support convinced Congress to provide matching funds-if POST could raise half the cost of the property. POST did just that, raising $5 million from Save the Redwoods League and from extraordinarily generous private donors. Then, literally agreeing to "buy or bust," POST staked their entire $3.5 million reserve and proceeds from the sale of the Phleger home to meet their final deadline, and the Phleger Estate turned from private property to public park early in 1995.

https://www.nps.gov/goga/phes.htm

 

所有跟帖: 

大慈大悲,和共产革命一样,都是有钱人搞出来的。 -betadine- 给 betadine 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 11/13/2021 postreply 09:51:24

西方人的工业革命破坏了自然,但是也有另一部分人站出来保护。 -萨克斯风- 给 萨克斯风 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 11/13/2021 postreply 09:51:29

环保主义者做了啥正事? -lucky_rain- 给 lucky_rain 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 11/13/2021 postreply 09:59:03

比如我说的这个例子, Phleger Estate, 假如没有POST那五位工作人员和志愿者,根本就不可能。 -咏月- 给 咏月 发送悄悄话 咏月 的博客首页 (84 bytes) () 11/13/2021 postreply 10:10:24

当然只有他们也不够,有钱人的慷慨解囊和整个社区的支持都同样缺一不可。 -咏月- 给 咏月 发送悄悄话 咏月 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 11/13/2021 postreply 10:13:58

有些人享受着环保的好处,同时反对保护自然,世界潮流不是几个自私自利的人能阻挡的 -hengheng-- 给 hengheng- 发送悄悄话 hengheng- 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 11/13/2021 postreply 10:11:41

环保的根本在于减少人类的总消费量。不厚道地说: 贫富差距有利于减少总消费量。这也是多数国家宁要一个皇帝不要一大群贵族 -Mount-ex- 给 Mount-ex 发送悄悄话 (343 bytes) () 11/13/2021 postreply 10:15:47

如果消费与人口成正比,那你的结论应该是控制人口,与贫富无关;如果是说富人消费太多,那应该是教育富人减少消费; -咏月- 给 咏月 发送悄悄话 咏月 的博客首页 (30 bytes) () 11/13/2021 postreply 10:22:59

我们穷人浪费资源更少,因为工作疲于奔命三顿醋茶淡饭 -青柏- 给 青柏 发送悄悄话 青柏 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 11/13/2021 postreply 10:29:12

吃一个馒头的比吃三个馒头,肯定浪费资源更少; 吃三个馒头是不是比吃一只龙虾更浪费? -咏月- 给 咏月 发送悄悄话 咏月 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 11/13/2021 postreply 10:33:23

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”