If the defendant's side letter published online

before the verdict of the criminal court, it would have been a clear obstruction of justice by definition in any states. Now, the DA' office can either go after it, or leave the plaintiff use as evidence at the civil court. No matter what, it doesn't help the defendant. As to definition in legal terms, different people interpret differently. The decision is always made by the judge. Let 'see what evolves at the civil court.

所有跟帖： 

• 哈，又来了 -几颗汗滴- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/02/2016 postreply 12:50:10

• 哈哈，大家想说话就说话，他们既然都写了帖子在公开场合，为什么别人只能够一个观点？ -yhr- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/02/2016 postreply 12:53:25

• There are examples how widely the -by心言- ♂ (146 bytes) () 04/02/2016 postreply 12:56:02

• I may if I keep telling them whatever they do is fine. -by心言- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/02/2016 postreply 13:58:35

• :)) -by心言- ♂ (192 bytes) () 04/02/2016 postreply 12:53:32

• 你是哪个法学院毕业的？ -郁金香花园- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/02/2016 postreply 13:05:52

• Go find the definition given by someone in -by心言- ♂ (136 bytes) () 04/02/2016 postreply 13:56:25