65" TV, Sharp LCD or Panasonic TC-P65S2 Plasma? Sharp $700 more.

来源: tengtengma 于 2010-07-29 09:38:06 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (56 bytes)

It said Panasonic plasma is engery star product as well.

所有跟帖： 

• Sharp. -巴西木- ♀ 给 巴西木 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 07/29/2010 postreply 09:39:59

• Plasma TV is better. -xhz3- ♂ 给 xhz3 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 07/29/2010 postreply 09:40:07

• Go for LED -skyport- ♂ 给 skyport 发送悄悄话 (31 bytes) () 07/29/2010 postreply 09:43:20

• LED tech is not mature yet. I will wait to buy 3D TV in the futu -tengtengma- ♀ 给 tengtengma 发送悄悄话 tengtengma 的博客首页 (243 bytes) () 07/29/2010 postreply 09:54:47

• It's also said 液晶电视对眼睛伤害可能大于等离子电视. -tengtengma- ♀ 给 tengtengma 发送悄悄话 tengtengma 的博客首页 (44 bytes) () 07/29/2010 postreply 09:44:08

• We hardly have time to watch tv. Most is for kids. -tengtengma- ♀ 给 tengtengma 发送悄悄话 tengtengma 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 07/29/2010 postreply 10:04:33

• 等离子的寿命不如液晶的寿命长，几年过后就要换管子。 -行不更名坐不改姓- ♂ 给 行不更名坐不改姓 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 07/29/2010 postreply 09:48:14

• seems klie now they have similar 寿命，几年过后maybe要换TV since TV impro -tengtengma- ♀ 给 tengtengma 发送悄悄话 tengtengma 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 07/29/2010 postreply 09:59:19

• PLASMA的图象好, 不过费电, LCD, LED现在做得也不错. -wszgr- ♀ 给 wszgr 发送悄悄话 wszgr 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 07/29/2010 postreply 09:54:44

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！