You need to be careful, you cannot ask them to sign a new lease.

回答: 请问:如何发落前房客北卡人_0012013-11-27 09:14:04
This situation is covered by PTFA (protecting tenants at foreclosure act), passed in 2009.
  •  There is nowhere in the law says tenant can get 90 days free rent, so it is bull shit.
  •  You have to honor the 3-year lease, the lease is still binding.   You cannot just go there and ask them to sign a new lease.
  • If they stop pay the rent, you can start Eviction for non-payment,

The Tenant’s argue point in this case though is whether the “previous owner’s foreclosure process” constitutes “breach the lease”.   

To determine that,  you need to read the language in the lease. 


For PTFA, See below:

In some states the lender could just show up on the doorstep and order the tenants out of the property. Many states provided that tenants
need be given only a few days to vacate the property.

But with the passage of the PTFA tenants, no matter where they live in the United States, are given at least 90-days' notice, or the
duration of their lease, before they have to vacate the property. This means that if you signed a one year lease in January, you will not have to move until the expiration of that lease at the end of December, no matter when the foreclosure sale takes place. If, however, your lease expires less than 90 days after the foreclosure sale, or you have a month-to-month tenancy, you will have at least 90 days to move. And while that's wonderful news for California tenants, it's even better news for the many tenants throughout the country who face instant eviction after a foreclosure sale.


所有跟帖: 

How does PTFA apply to a 前房主 after a foreclosure? -webby- 给 webby 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 11/27/2013 postreply 10:48:39

Nothing. -PineRock- 给 PineRock 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 11/27/2013 postreply 10:54:26

回复:You need to be careful, you cannot ask them to sign a new lea -北卡人_001- 给 北卡人_001 发送悄悄话 (651 bytes) () 11/27/2013 postreply 10:49:37

That is all BS. Start eviction process for non-payment. -pinerock- 给 pinerock 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 11/27/2013 postreply 10:53:35

俺认为pinerock只说对了大部分 -凌长老- 给 凌长老 发送悄悄话 凌长老 的博客首页 (242 bytes) () 11/27/2013 postreply 11:06:19

回复:俺认为pinerock只说对了大部分 -北卡人_001- 给 北卡人_001 发送悄悄话 (413 bytes) () 11/27/2013 postreply 11:14:26

PTFA supercedes state law -凌长老- 给 凌长老 发送悄悄话 凌长老 的博客首页 (125 bytes) () 11/27/2013 postreply 11:26:55

回复:PTFA supercedes state law -北卡人_001- 给 北卡人_001 发送悄悄话 (114 bytes) () 11/27/2013 postreply 11:32:19

长老 may be right, the law is vague and there are different interp -pinerock- 给 pinerock 发送悄悄话 (297 bytes) () 11/27/2013 postreply 11:45:51

回复:长老 may be right, the law is vague and there are different int --企鹅-- 给 -企鹅- 发送悄悄话 -企鹅- 的博客首页 (33 bytes) () 11/27/2013 postreply 12:43:28

回复:长老 may be right, the law is vague and there are different int -北卡人_001- 给 北卡人_001 发送悄悄话 (49 bytes) () 11/27/2013 postreply 14:04:21

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!