He at least got one thing right:

来源: 中间小谢 于 2019-11-08 16:35:30 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (700 bytes)
回答: 说红歌，想到方励之的一篇短文 由 悟空孙 于 2019-11-08 12:45:01

Sciences in the west didn't just come out of the blue. Most educated Chinese converted to western culture have a naive view regarding the legacy of western sciences. Often in awe of their visible effects today, tracing back to the Greeks a little, then happy with stopping there, and they always forget that the Greeks had to learnt from the Egyptians to become inspired for their subsequential creations too.

However, when Fang started to "think", he fell for the same trap - oversimplifying things. Therefore he was still not truly inspired by what he had just witnessed.

 

 

 

所有跟帖： 

• 如果说话不“oversimplifying things”， -豆角儿- ♂ 给 豆角儿 发送悄悄话 (83 bytes) () 11/08/2019 postreply 20:04:28

• There is a difference btw summarizing and oversimplifying . -中间小谢- ♂ 给 中间小谢 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 11/08/2019 postreply 20:35:53

• You have greatly oversimplified what you were trying to say: -豆角儿- ♂ 给 豆角儿 发送悄悄话 (974 bytes) () 11/08/2019 postreply 22:14:42

• 我們不要糾結 oversimplify 指什么了，展開討論太長。 -中间小谢- ♂ 给 中间小谢 发送悄悄话 (555 bytes) () 11/08/2019 postreply 22:46:22

• 这不仅仅是英文水平问题，这是概念含混不清的问题， -豆角儿- ♂ 给 豆角儿 发送悄悄话 (1763 bytes) () 11/08/2019 postreply 23:44:33

• 我覺得你還是跟原文作者直接討論比較好。 -中间小谢- ♂ 给 中间小谢 发送悄悄话 (517 bytes) () 11/09/2019 postreply 00:06:57

• 好吧。你认为自己不需要严谨，更不需要脸红。 -豆角儿- ♂ 给 豆角儿 发送悄悄话 (128 bytes) () 11/09/2019 postreply 00:43:40

• 没品。不過如此。 -中间小谢- ♂ 给 中间小谢 发送悄悄话 (68 bytes) () 11/09/2019 postreply 01:07:26

• 是的，就我这点儿学识，我根本没有资格和原文作者讨论问题。 -豆角儿- ♂ 给 豆角儿 发送悄悄话 (192 bytes) () 11/09/2019 postreply 01:11:38

• 你有。討論問題怎么會没有资格呢？無論跟誰。 -中间小谢- ♂ 给 中间小谢 发送悄悄话 (242 bytes) () 11/09/2019 postreply 07:15:53

• 是，我们两个之间的区别在于我认为我没有资格，因为我知道自己的无知， -豆角儿- ♂ 给 豆角儿 发送悄悄话 (170 bytes) () 11/09/2019 postreply 10:48:05

• 你没搞懂现代科学和古希腊文明的联系是什么。古希腊可能从古埃及学了些东西，但那些东西与现代科学无关。 -QualityWithoutName- ♂ 给 QualityWithoutName 发送悄悄话 QualityWithoutName 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 11/08/2019 postreply 21:42:11

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！