You have greatly oversimplified what you were trying to say:

“…when Fang started to "think", he fell for the same trap - oversimplifying things. Therefore he was still not truly inspired by what he had just witnessed.”

Here, you didn‘t explain the reason why a person can’t be truly inspired by something without knowing its whole history, which seems to me not true at all.

 

Also, there is no problem to write in English, but, please write in genuine English.

For example:

You can be converted to Islam, or Christianity, however, you can’t be converted to western culture, since, you can be a Christian, there is no way you can be western culture.

You can only accept or learn from western culture.

There is also a typo in your text, it should have been: “the Greeks had learnt from the Egyptians”, not “the Greeks had to learnt from the Egyptians”

所有跟帖: 

我們不要糾結 oversimplify 指什么了,展開討論太長。 -中间小谢- 给 中间小谢 发送悄悄话 (555 bytes) () 11/08/2019 postreply 22:46:22

这不仅仅是英文水平问题,这是概念含混不清的问题, -豆角儿- 给 豆角儿 发送悄悄话 (1763 bytes) () 11/08/2019 postreply 23:44:33

我覺得你還是跟原文作者直接討論比較好。 -中间小谢- 给 中间小谢 发送悄悄话 (517 bytes) () 11/09/2019 postreply 00:06:57

好吧。你认为自己不需要严谨,更不需要脸红。 -豆角儿- 给 豆角儿 发送悄悄话 (128 bytes) () 11/09/2019 postreply 00:43:40

没品。不過如此。 -中间小谢- 给 中间小谢 发送悄悄话 (68 bytes) () 11/09/2019 postreply 01:07:26

是的,就我这点儿学识,我根本没有资格和原文作者讨论问题。 -豆角儿- 给 豆角儿 发送悄悄话 (192 bytes) () 11/09/2019 postreply 01:11:38

你有。討論問題怎么會没有资格呢?無論跟誰。 -中间小谢- 给 中间小谢 发送悄悄话 (242 bytes) () 11/09/2019 postreply 07:15:53

是,我们两个之间的区别在于我认为我没有资格,因为我知道自己的无知, -豆角儿- 给 豆角儿 发送悄悄话 (170 bytes) () 11/09/2019 postreply 10:48:05

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!