相对于BBC的实验，我还是更相信哈佛医学院的结论。

https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/features/frank-sacks-swap-saturated-fats-for-healthier-fats/

 

It is understandable that many people are confused or cynical when they hear about a new study that contradicts what they thought was accepted science. One suggestion would be to look at nutritional guidelines on websites of organizations such as the American Heart Association or the American Diabetes Association. Those guidelines tend to be very carefully discussed and research is carefully evaluated, and the guidelines are a bit on the conservative side, which I think makes sense. 

 

所有跟帖： 

• 老套套不等于保守。你链接的文章无非就是墨守饱和脂肪坏这个陈规 -Manymore- ♀ (265 bytes) () 01/23/2018 postreply 08:45:54

• 文章是一个综述，后面有大量的比BBC质量更高的实验支持，文章也建议遵循AHA的指南。 -TBz- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/23/2018 postreply 08:50:28

• 这就属于百花绽放，还没有下定论。 -薛成- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/23/2018 postreply 09:23:11

• BBC好几个实验都有点 哗众取宠的意思 -Teetrinker- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/23/2018 postreply 10:40:14