相对于BBC的实验,我还是更相信哈佛医学院的结论。

来源: 2018-01-23 08:37:55 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (994 bytes)

https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/features/frank-sacks-swap-saturated-fats-for-healthier-fats/

 

It is understandable that many people are confused or cynical when they hear about a new study that contradicts what they thought was accepted science. One suggestion would be to look at nutritional guidelines on websites of organizations such as the American Heart Association or the American Diabetes Association. Those guidelines tend to be very carefully discussed and research is carefully evaluated, and the guidelines are a bit on the conservative side, which I think makes sense. 

 

所有跟帖: 

老套套不等于保守。你链接的文章无非就是墨守饱和脂肪坏这个陈规 -Manymore- 给 Manymore 发送悄悄话 Manymore 的博客首页 Manymore 的个人群组 (265 bytes) () 01/23/2018 postreply 08:45:54

文章是一个综述,后面有大量的比BBC质量更高的实验支持,文章也建议遵循AHA的指南。 -TBz- 给 TBz 发送悄悄话 TBz 的博客首页 TBz 的个人群组 (0 bytes) () 01/23/2018 postreply 08:50:28

这就属于百花绽放,还没有下定论。 -薛成- 给 薛成 发送悄悄话 薛成 的博客首页 薛成 的个人群组 (0 bytes) () 01/23/2018 postreply 09:23:11

BBC好几个实验都有点 哗众取宠的意思 -Teetrinker- 给 Teetrinker 发送悄悄话 Teetrinker 的博客首页 Teetrinker 的个人群组 (0 bytes) () 01/23/2018 postreply 10:40:14

加跟帖:

  • 笔名:      密码: 保持登录状态一个月,直到我退出登录。
  • 标题:
  • 内容(可选项): [所见即所得|预览模式] [HTML源代码] [如何上传图片] [怎样发视频] [如何贴音乐]
回到顶部