I don't think you can compare 0.008% to 4% directly

来源: michaelusa2 2021-04-19 07:07:13 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (369 bytes)

they are based on different population, 0.008% based on full-vaccined people, while, 4% is based on people who felt sick or randomly picked for testing which is a subset of non-vaccinated people + full-vaccination people

所有跟帖: 

0.008% is based on time span while 4% is daily -michaelusa2- 给 michaelusa2 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 04/19/2021 postreply 07:12:17

这个问题已经在给slow_quick的答复中解释了。见回复的“内容”区。这里假设在一定时段内都是4%,并从而得出一个量级上有意义 -密码过期- 给 密码过期 发送悄悄话 密码过期 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 04/19/2021 postreply 07:47:39

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”