我想您肯定没看过那篇文章吧。看看作者的结论吧

“In conclusion, we found that vaccination provided protection against medically attended influenza infection, regardless of prior vaccination history. This is consistent with randomized clinical trials of influenza vaccine efficacy []. However, this study raises relevant questions about the potential interference of repeated annual influenza vaccination and possible residual protection from previous season vaccination that have not been considered in most trials. Further observational studies that include simultaneous assessment of immune response, both to vaccine antigens and previously circulating viruses, and clinical protection would be helpful. In addition, we believe the results of this study and others support the need for another multiseason randomized clinical trial. Although a randomized trial cannot be conducted in the United States where influenza vaccination is universally recommended, it may be feasible in countries that do not currently recommend influenza vaccination for healthy adults. This would provide valuable new information about the impact of repeated annual influenza vaccination, and it will help guide future vaccine policy recommendations..”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4207422/

所有跟帖: 

作者为了不得罪人,做出一些政治正确的结论,这在科学研究里是很常见的现象,很多时候,作者的结论和具体的细节基本相反,这是可以理解的 -医者意也- 给 医者意也 发送悄悄话 医者意也 的博客首页 (123 bytes) () 12/01/2015 postreply 09:13:19

数据就是数据,怎么说并不能改变数据,只能误导一些看不懂数据的人。 -吃与活- 给 吃与活 发送悄悄话 吃与活 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/01/2015 postreply 09:30:50

一样的数据,按摩一下,就可以随意做出任何想要的结论,那些只看标题只看结论的人就容易被误导。 -医者意也- 给 医者意也 发送悄悄话 医者意也 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/01/2015 postreply 09:45:25

独家处理方法?:) -吃与活- 给 吃与活 发送悄悄话 吃与活 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/01/2015 postreply 10:00:50

我从来不搞这些小动作的,因为不需要申请政府经费,不需要药厂资助。呵呵 -医者意也- 给 医者意也 发送悄悄话 医者意也 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/01/2015 postreply 10:03:12

谢谢分享。你花时间找到并给出原文链接,感谢。 -欲千北- 给 欲千北 发送悄悄话 欲千北 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/01/2015 postreply 09:30:47

对有疑问的结论,不看原文不行啊:) -吃与活- 给 吃与活 发送悄悄话 吃与活 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/01/2015 postreply 10:03:19

完全同意,必须看原文,至少得看摘要,不然容易误解。我找了半天找不到,谢谢你的时间。有空看原文。 -欲千北- 给 欲千北 发送悄悄话 欲千北 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/01/2015 postreply 10:08:52

看了下原文38,感觉按摩数据的可能性还是蛮明显的。几个数据统计的口径变来变去。感觉是为了得到某些结论而挑些数据来用似的。 -万山红遍- 给 万山红遍 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/01/2015 postreply 12:30:08

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!