关于John Richardson的人品--回天儿晴了网友

本帖于 2015-02-09 20:01:22 时间, 由普通用户 吃与活 编辑
天儿晴了网友问:

“还有关于John Richardson的人品。如果他就是一个唯利是图的人,他的朋友(我忘了名字了)怎么会愿意站出来为他说话?要知道他已经锒铛入狱,面对的是国家机器和强大的正规医疗部门。如果你我是他的朋友,会在什么情况下愿意站出来为他说话?那个人的老婆曾经是John诊所的护士,在John去世很多年她仍然站出来证明苦杏仁有效,为什么?”

Richardson原来是一个全科医生,1954年开始开业,并不算很成功,因为1972年他的税前收入$10400(相当于$58,757 in 2014)。在1971年与苦杏仁素的发明人小克利博商量后,他决定成为一个癌症专科医生。然后在1974年,仅两年以后,通过每个病人一个疗程收$2000 (相当于$9,615.38 in 2014), 他的纯收入$172,981(相当于$831,639 in 2014)。折合成2014年的价格,他的收入在两年内增加了14倍。

我不认为Richardson一开始就是个维利是图的人。请想一想徐才厚们一开始就是坏人吗?但是当他看到这么多钱以后,他还能不能看到苦杏仁素不能治癌症的事实,我就深表怀疑了。我希望他在去世之前认真地审视他所做的一切,思考因为他的牟利,耽误了多少癌症患者,能够忏悔。

那位为他作证的人,如果他老婆是Richardson诊所的护士,那么他们就是利益相关者,其证词又有多少可信度呢?

我的确相信多数介绍苦杏仁疗法的人和网友并没有任何利益关系,他们仅仅是不能识破这些骗术而已。

我翻译的文章是发表在专业期刊,读者是医生。他最后问了这样两个问题:

“下一代的抗癌骗术的鼓动者能够从苦杏仁素运动中学习到足够的经验并加以改善吗? 或者,我们的医疗人员能从中得到足够的教训来迅速有效地揭穿下一个骗术吗?"

我觉得如果他写给一般公众,他也许还会问这样一个问题:

“我们一般的患者和公众是不是能从苦杏仁素现象中得到足够的免疫力来理性应对下一个骗术呢?是不是因为你们的内心是一片晴空,天空就不时时飘过来乌云了呢?”

数据来源

http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/laetrile.html

The First "Metabolic" Doctor

John Richardson was a general practitioner who began practice in the San Francisco Bay area in 1954. In 1971, after discussions with Krebs, Jr., he decided to become a cancer specialist. He had not encountered overwhelming success as a general practitioner. His 1972 income tax return revealed that he had grossed $88,000 in his medical practice, leaving a net of only $10,400 taxable income.

Richardson's practice boomed as a result of his newly found status as a cancer "expert." He states that "Our office soon was filled with faces we had never seen before—hopeful faces of men and women who had been abandoned by orthodox medicine as hopeless or "terminal" cases." In 1974, he reported that his medical practice had grossed $783,000, with a net income of $172,981. By charging patients $2,000 for a course of Laetrile, Richardson managed to increase his net income 17-fold in just two years. According to his income tax returns, Richardson grossed $2.8 million dollars from his Laetrile practice between January 1973 and March 1976. The actual amount of money he received may have even been higher. In Laetrile Case Histories, he claimed to have treated 4,000 patients, with an average charge of $2,500 per patient. Culbert states that by 1976 Richardson had treated 6,000 patients. If these figures are correct, Richardson would have grossed between $10 and $15 million dollars during this time.

Richardson's practice changed significantly after he began treating cancer patients with Laetrile. He also began treating what he termed "pre-clinical syndrome" patients with Laetrile. These were patients with no identifiable tumor or lesion who complained of feelings of "impending doom, malaise, unexplained or vague pains, headaches, bowel changes, loss of appetite, loss of energy, and depression." According to Richardson, cancer patients reported a reduction in pain, an improved appetite, return of strength, and an improved mental outlook. In addition, high blood pressure returned to normal.

In spite of these "dramatic improvements," Richardson admitted that most of his cancer patients died. In an attempt to overcome this, he increased the Laetrile dosage to nine grams, six days a week, and placed patients on a vegetarian diet and "massive" doses of regular vitamins. Richardson coined the phrase "metabolic therapy" to refer to this combination of diet manipulation, vitamins and Laetrile.

In June 1972, Richardson's office was raided and he was arrested for violating California's Cancer Law. He was convicted of this charge, but the conviction was overturned on a technicality and a new trial ordered. Two more trials followed which resulted in hung juries. Hearings before the California Board of Medical Quality Assurance in 1976 resulted in the revocation of his California medical license. He then worked at a Mexican cancer clinic. During the 1980s, he practiced under a homeopathic license in Nevada until he had open heart surgery and entered an irreversible coma.

The Political Explosion

Dr. Richardson's arrest triggered the formation of the Committee for Freedom of Choice in Cancer Therapy (now called the Committee for Freedom of Choice in Medicine). The group's founder and President was Robert Bradford, a former laboratory technician at Stanford University. Michael Culbert, who at the time of Richardson's arrest was an editor at the Berkeley Daily Gazette, became a major spokesman for the Committee, editing their newsletter, The Choice, and writing two books promoting Laetrile: Vitamin B-17: Forbidden Weapon Against Cancer (1974) and Freedom From Cancer (1976).

Culbert was assisted in editing The Choice by Maureen Salaman, wife of Committee vice-chairman Frank Salaman. The Committee's legislative advisor was Georgia Congressman Larry McDonald, a urologist who used Laetrile. CFCCT's activities were closely allied with the John Birch Society, to which Richardson, Bradford, Culbert, the Salamans and McDonald all belonged. Soon after its formation, CFCCT established local chapters throughout the United States and used bookshops associated with the John Birch Society to hold meetings and distribute literature.

In May 1976 Richardson was indicted, along with his office manager, Ralph Bowman, and fellow CFCCT members Robert Bradford and Frank Salaman, for conspiring to smuggle Laetrile. A year later all were convicted of the charges. Bradford was fined $40,000, Richardson $20,000, and Salaman and Bowman $10,000 each. During the trial it was disclosed that Bradford had paid $1.2 million dollars for 700 shipments of Laetrile and that Richardson had banked more than $2.5 million during a 27-month period.

所有跟帖: 

1,此世如果有1种人类职业与金钱最冲突,則不是国王不是妓女不是杀手。。。而是医师。2,如果 -大江川- 给 大江川 发送悄悄话 大江川 的博客首页 (130 bytes) () 02/09/2015 postreply 20:22:33

为医者,为求安宁自保,只好尽量无为而治。 -大江川- 给 大江川 发送悄悄话 大江川 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/09/2015 postreply 20:25:40

你又开始胡言乱语。 -天儿晴了- 给 天儿晴了 发送悄悄话 天儿晴了 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2015 postreply 06:07:54

赞认真求证。 -xuxinxuexi888- 给 xuxinxuexi888 发送悄悄话 xuxinxuexi888 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/09/2015 postreply 21:00:33

真是认真啊。 -TBz- 给 TBz 发送悄悄话 TBz 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/09/2015 postreply 21:59:54

多谢。不过我可能太固执了,怎么觉得没啥说服力呢? -天儿晴了- 给 天儿晴了 发送悄悄话 天儿晴了 的博客首页 (643 bytes) () 02/10/2015 postreply 05:52:49

先入为主呗。 我有些病人几年的毛病我几天给治好了都觉得和我没有什么关系,是上帝显灵了。因为医院和他说过他的毛病一辈子也好不了。 -ephd- 给 ephd 发送悄悄话 ephd 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2015 postreply 06:41:37

人们相信自己愿意相信的 -吃与活- 给 吃与活 发送悄悄话 吃与活 的博客首页 (2008 bytes) () 02/10/2015 postreply 06:50:03

呵呵,如果你认为你所举的例子有可比性的话那就有可比性吧。 -天儿晴了- 给 天儿晴了 发送悄悄话 天儿晴了 的博客首页 (418 bytes) () 02/10/2015 postreply 07:09:05

哈哈,如果大家只是逞口舌之快,言行不一,那么就是我too simple sometimes naive了:)不浪费时间了,干点正 -吃与活- 给 吃与活 发送悄悄话 吃与活 的博客首页 (201 bytes) () 02/10/2015 postreply 07:37:23

对对对,都干正事吧,多谢你陪我玩一早上。 -天儿晴了- 给 天儿晴了 发送悄悄话 天儿晴了 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2015 postreply 07:44:37

我是有多大条,忙完了正事才琢磨出来原来人家在损我。 -天儿晴了- 给 天儿晴了 发送悄悄话 天儿晴了 的博客首页 (107 bytes) () 02/10/2015 postreply 09:36:54

没有这个意思:) -吃与活- 给 吃与活 发送悄悄话 吃与活 的博客首页 (49 bytes) () 02/10/2015 postreply 10:00:33

你在哪看出来我是逗你玩了呢?我觉得我是120%的认真,但怎么解读取决于你。这个帖子我回到此为止了。 -天儿晴了- 给 天儿晴了 发送悄悄话 天儿晴了 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2015 postreply 10:11:45

俺不关心他的人品,关键是疗效的证据有多强。 -viewfinder- 给 viewfinder 发送悄悄话 viewfinder 的博客首页 (466 bytes) () 02/10/2015 postreply 09:11:08

点赞 -七把叉叉- 给 七把叉叉 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2015 postreply 10:06:38

同意。在我看来证据不能再充分了。如果这还算不上骗术,那么就天下无贼了。 -吃与活- 给 吃与活 发送悄悄话 吃与活 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2015 postreply 12:00:38

他收费高并不能作为其人是欺骗的理由,如果这样也是证据的话,西医收费高的比比皆是,是否也是西医是欺骗的证据? -医者意也- 给 医者意也 发送悄悄话 医者意也 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2015 postreply 12:13:01

我写了两个帖子都有其无效的证据,见内 -吃与活- 给 吃与活 发送悄悄话 吃与活 的博客首页 (250 bytes) () 02/10/2015 postreply 12:42:14

有一本书,叫做“你永远都无法叫醒一个装睡的人”, 周濂写的。适合茶馆说书。 -Lily168- 给 Lily168 发送悄悄话 Lily168 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2015 postreply 12:48:45

What can I say? Fire, wake up ! -吃与活- 给 吃与活 发送悄悄话 吃与活 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2015 postreply 15:09:01

每一个医生每一个医疗方法都可以找到无效的例子,这不能说明啥。化疗治癌无效的例子更加多了,收费也更高的多,那你为啥不说化疗是骗术? -医者意也- 给 医者意也 发送悄悄话 医者意也 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2015 postreply 17:58:35

看来您真的不懂统计数据与个例的区别 -吃与活- 给 吃与活 发送悄悄话 吃与活 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2015 postreply 19:46:32

说的正是统计,有大量的统计证明化疗是无效的。 -医者意也- 给 医者意也 发送悄悄话 医者意也 的博客首页 (6 bytes) () 02/11/2015 postreply 05:28:21

如果其他所有的无效证据一概都不看,剩下的也就只是收费高的证据, 那么果然就是证据不足了。 -Lily168- 给 Lily168 发送悄悄话 Lily168 的博客首页 (6 bytes) () 02/10/2015 postreply 12:46:33

健康坛有不少癌症患者来分享他们的经验,这么多年来,有没有一个患者实例是使用Gerson疗法或者苦杏仁来控制或者改善病情的? -Lily168- 给 Lily168 发送悄悄话 Lily168 的博客首页 (146 bytes) () 02/10/2015 postreply 12:29:54

"你可以给别人信息,但别人的选择倾向基本上是不可能被争论说服滴。这种倾向也许只有亲身经历才能改变。" 说的好 -Lily168- 给 Lily168 发送悄悄话 Lily168 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2015 postreply 12:38:46

嗯,如果选择看不见事实,那么不管证据多么有力,还是跟不存在一个样。 -吃与活- 给 吃与活 发送悄悄话 吃与活 的博客首页 (24 bytes) () 02/10/2015 postreply 12:46:32

很认真,辛苦了. -闽姑- 给 闽姑 发送悄悄话 闽姑 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2015 postreply 17:25:24

闽姑最近很忙吧 -吃与活- 给 吃与活 发送悄悄话 吃与活 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2015 postreply 19:04:52

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!