Is the US actually losing its trade war against China?

来源: 唵啊吽 2023-01-06 13:17:50 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (8420 bytes)

Is the US actually losing its economic leverage in the China-US trade war?

Yes. The US is losing its moral high ground. China has adopted a market economy according to the liberal democracy point of view in the last 40 years, accepting that free competition in the market economy is good for the world. Now the US is using its state apparatus heavy-handed to interfere with the global supply chains, trying to win not by free competition but by sanctions and blockages.

The military-industrial complex and a few monopoly capitals may win in the trade war because they profit a lot in the 2022 world turmoil. Yet the people of the US as a whole are losing because of inflation. Their living standard decreased due to the trade war against China. People of China, on the other hand, still maintain their living standard if it is not improving.

The trade war is a loss-loss game. Both the US and China are losing. If look into the inflation rates, we notice that the US has an inflation rate 4 times as high as that of China. The people of the US lost a lot by waging a trade war against China.

One of the aggregated indexes measuring the overall living standard is life expectancy. During the trade war waged by Trump, the life expectancy in the US dropped while the life expectancy in China keep claiming. Now China has a longer life expectancy than the US.

You may argue that the drop in life expectancy in the US is due to COVID. The US is the leading country in medical and virus study and research and has the most advanced healthcare resources. The medical facilities in the US per capita are much higher than in China. The US failed to protect its people from the virus because the US government is using the pandemic for its trade war against China. The US is not fighting the virus but taking the opportunity of the pandemic to suppress China. More than a million Americans died of COVID for the sake of a trade war against China.

With today’s technology and productivity, people of the world can and should improve their living standards as a whole. That’s why China advocates win-win cooperation. Yet the US opts to the loss-loss game of the trade war.

The trade war and tech war are bad for China, the US, and the world. If mankind can make the optimal choices, they shouldn’t have put themself in such a situation. All people of the world can and should live prosperously. They can’t because some oligarchs are profiting from the new cold war against China.

Americans are losing in the trade war. The people of the world are losing in the trade war and in the new cold war against China.

所有跟帖: 

大牛英文表达流畅!英文口语怎么样?哪天说一个? -妖妖灵- 给 妖妖灵 发送悄悄话 妖妖灵 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 01/06/2023 postreply 13:59:04

我口语不行。我去Toastmaser International有两年了。这里有我一个演讲视频。 -唵啊吽- 给 唵啊吽 发送悄悄话 唵啊吽 的博客首页 (138 bytes) () 01/06/2023 postreply 19:40:12

绘声绘色,很棒啊!为什么要留胡子呢?不要胡子是不是更好?我觉得你和鲁迅的相片很像。:) -妖妖灵- 给 妖妖灵 发送悄悄话 妖妖灵 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 01/06/2023 postreply 20:39:40

谢谢。鲁迅可能讲日语。 -唵啊吽- 给 唵啊吽 发送悄悄话 唵啊吽 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 01/07/2023 postreply 07:57:21

我很敢说,今天上班开会,我肯定是发言的前两三名了,所以,希望自己的口音越少越好,别丢人:) -妖妖灵- 给 妖妖灵 发送悄悄话 妖妖灵 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 01/06/2023 postreply 20:41:32

工作一段时间,同事都会接受一些口音,对工作交流没有太大影响。 -唵啊吽- 给 唵啊吽 发送悄悄话 唵啊吽 的博客首页 (288 bytes) () 01/07/2023 postreply 07:56:37

是像鲁迅先生!哈哈哈 -rockcurrent- 给 rockcurrent 发送悄悄话 rockcurrent 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 01/06/2023 postreply 20:55:41

哈哈哈,英雄所见略同啊:)还有谁也这么觉得? -妖妖灵- 给 妖妖灵 发送悄悄话 妖妖灵 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 01/06/2023 postreply 21:25:10

我也觉得。:) -jianchi9090- 给 jianchi9090 发送悄悄话 jianchi9090 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 01/07/2023 postreply 14:12:20

大家都是英雄:) -妖妖灵- 给 妖妖灵 发送悄悄话 妖妖灵 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 01/07/2023 postreply 14:44:10

没想到美国那条线掉得这么厉害。 我本来一直觉得中国经济不行了、 -jianchi9090- 给 jianchi9090 发送悄悄话 jianchi9090 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 01/06/2023 postreply 16:18:48

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”