I'm not so sure

来源: 冲浪潜水员 于 2013-04-04 03:16:40 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读： 次 (515 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ 冲浪潜水员 ] 在 2013-04-07 20:33:18 编辑过。如有问题，请报告版主或论坛管理删除.
回答: Globalization 由 Lucidus 于 2013-04-03 19:52:39

It seems to me the environmental problems in China are mostly due to rapid development without sufficient regulation and monitoring.

Imagine the situation in which Globalization does not happen for the trade of consumer products. China will still grow exponentially with newly imported technologies by supplying the domestic market. Most likely, polution will still happen simply because environment protection is not a priority compared with development.

Does this make sense?

所有跟帖： 

• I would say … -Lucidus- ♂ 给 Lucidus 发送悄悄话 Lucidus 的博客首页 (1696 bytes) () 04/04/2013 postreply 05:35:03

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”