not exclusive use, not adverse posession

来源: 柠檬椰子汁 于 2019-05-25 09:55:08 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (281 bytes)
本帖于 2019-05-25 09:57:39 时间, 由版主 柠檬椰子汁 编辑
回答: 请教柠檬： Adverse possession 由 rapidestate 于 2019-05-25 08:11:04

usually they have to fence it off or build something that cause you not to use it

miwung lawn or driveway is not exclusive use, at least you need fence

and to claim title to adverse possessed land, you have to go to court

 

所有跟帖： 

• driveway is not exclusive? who else use a personal drive way? -rapidestate- ♂ 给 rapidestate 发送悄悄话 rapidestate 的博客首页 (44 bytes) () 05/25/2019 postreply 15:52:14

• according to you, mowing lawn is exclusive use -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ 给 柠檬椰子汁 发送悄悄话 柠檬椰子汁 的博客首页 (357 bytes) () 05/25/2019 postreply 16:18:08

• You are wrong. Here is an identical example. Court approved it. -rapidestate- ♂ 给 rapidestate 发送悄悄话 rapidestate 的博客首页 (104 bytes) () 05/25/2019 postreply 21:40:34

• 我也看见过几个例子。有人把车停在dead-end的终端，结果这块地从city转到了他手里。车谁都可以停，没有什么exclusiv -sweetptt- ♂ 给 sweetptt 发送悄悄话 sweetptt 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 05/25/2019 postreply 22:14:46

• 一个案件不能成为放之四海而皆准的法律 -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ 给 柠檬椰子汁 发送悄悄话 柠檬椰子汁 的博客首页 (137 bytes) () 05/26/2019 postreply 03:17:24

• 这不是两家都有自己草坪，一家帮另一家剪草然后take over. -rapidestate- ♂ 给 rapidestate 发送悄悄话 rapidestate 的博客首页 (358 bytes) () 05/26/2019 postreply 06:16:04

• scope of use -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ 给 柠檬椰子汁 发送悄悄话 柠檬椰子汁 的博客首页 (351 bytes) () 05/26/2019 postreply 14:00:39

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！