according to you, mowing lawn is exclusive use

at best, you can prove that you own the "easement" on that land, which means, he can't make you to tear down the driveway.

Your dream of somehow having a driveway entitles you to build a garage on that spot is pure fantasy.

This is how legal dispute starts, greedy clients, not greedy lawyers. 

所有跟帖： 

• You are wrong. Here is an identical example. Court approved it. -rapidestate- ♂ (104 bytes) () 05/25/2019 postreply 21:40:34

• 我也看见过几个例子。有人把车停在dead-end的终端，结果这块地从city转到了他手里。车谁都可以停，没有什么exclusiv -sweetptt- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/25/2019 postreply 22:14:46

• 一个案件不能成为放之四海而皆准的法律 -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ (137 bytes) () 05/26/2019 postreply 03:17:24

• 这不是两家都有自己草坪，一家帮另一家剪草然后take over. -rapidestate- ♂ (358 bytes) () 05/26/2019 postreply 06:16:04

• scope of use -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ (351 bytes) () 05/26/2019 postreply 14:00:39