here are two version of definitions of HIV检查的准确率为95%:
1.
for each test the accuracy is 95%.
in this case 小王被感染的概率 is 95%.
2.
100 infected people take the test, 95% turn out HIV阳性. and 100 uninfected people take the test, 5% turn out HIV阳性.
this is totally different case than case one.
can you define HIV检查的准确率为95% ?
所有跟帖:
•
问得好,我感觉定义的模糊才
-是这道题失败的关键。-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
07/14/2004 postreply
15:50:56
•
There is nothing vague
-idiot94-
♀
(588 bytes)
()
07/14/2004 postreply
15:59:53
•
别给别人上课来显示你的“聪明”
-那叫哗众取宠-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
07/14/2004 postreply
16:22:41
•
LoL.. I am idiot :D
-idiot94-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
07/14/2004 postreply
16:48:28
•
He is not“聪明”, but
-sentinel-
♀
(99 bytes)
()
07/14/2004 postreply
17:17:46
•
你是轮子派来的不?请跟我去兵坛,让我好好操操你
-花剪刀-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
07/14/2004 postreply
17:44:26
•
Blind guy, get out here!
-sentinel-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
07/14/2004 postreply
17:48:37
•
回复:There is nothing vague
-heg-
♀
(527 bytes)
()
07/14/2004 postreply
17:49:52
•
Good question!
-sentinel-
♀
(87 bytes)
()
07/14/2004 postreply
16:14:29
•
don't forgot the condition
-heg-
♀
(666 bytes)
()
07/14/2004 postreply
17:58:57
•
I'm happy to see a real
-sentinel-
♀
(291 bytes)
()
07/14/2004 postreply
18:11:46
•
回复:I'm happy to see a real
-heg-
♀
(348 bytes)
()
07/14/2004 postreply
19:01:10
•
Thanks!
-sentinel-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
07/14/2004 postreply
19:05:47
•
ok, if it is the second case:
-junjunbos-
♀
(391 bytes)
()
07/14/2004 postreply
18:18:44
•
2%的答案大错特措了!不可能这么低!
-不轻易下结论-
♀
(10 bytes)
()
07/14/2004 postreply
18:57:59
•
well, according to definition
-junjunbos-
♀
(70 bytes)
()
07/14/2004 postreply
19:04:51
•
你的论证很有意思,可以称作悖论了。
-不轻易下结论-
♀
(98 bytes)
()
07/14/2004 postreply
19:11:15