"equal" fight

来源: ##^^## 于 2004-07-07 06:22:42 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (398 bytes)
本帖于 2004-08-02 11:21:45 时间, 由普通用户 stp 编辑

1. You can also get lawyers who made contributions to
judges.

2. You can require a jury trial as defendent. Your lawyer has as much right to pick the jury as the other
side.

3. You can have your own lobbists as much as the other
side.

Of course, if your view of justice is way outside of
the main stream (i.e. can't find one out of 12 juries
to support it), you have no resource, or you are
the aggressive party, the other side would have
advantage.

所有跟帖： 

• 你知道JURY的traning是怎么做的吗？ -热情以被你耗尽- ♀ 给 热情以被你耗尽 发送悄悄话 (398 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 08:14:19

• Jury --- your peers!! -##^^##- ♀ 给 ##^^## 发送悄悄话 (398 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 08:48:36

• 回复：Jury --- your peers!! -OJhadmoney- ♀ 给 OJhadmoney 发送悄悄话 (398 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 08:57:35

• Rodney King get away with $MM -???!!!???- ♀ 给 ???!!!??? 发送悄悄话 (398 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 09:50:12

• 讲话要有依据，不要瞎猜 -热情以被你耗尽- ♀ 给 热情以被你耗尽 发送悄悄话 (398 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 09:47:13

• 我讲的是指刑事案。民案我不清楚。 -热情以被你耗尽- ♀ 给 热情以被你耗尽 发送悄悄话 (398 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 09:50:04

• 刑事案的程序只比民事复杂，不会简单。民事案我都没见过走过场 -就完的- ♀ 给 就完的 发送悄悄话 (32 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 18:13:43

• 被告有和控方同样的机会对陪审团解释案情，我过手的案子还没见过 -走过场就完呢- ♀ 给 走过场就完呢 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 18:09:47

• 请你详细解释一下。我在联邦法院工作，没见过什么jury的培训 -这是什么东西？- ♀ 给 这是什么东西？ 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 18:05:17

• 哼哼,他是想说INSTRUCTION吧 -Michelle74- ♀ 给 Michelle74 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 18:09:15

• 这样啊，呵呵，我觉得他对CIV/CR PROCEDURE根本 -完全不了解- ♀ 给 完全不了解 发送悄悄话 (34 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 18:11:40

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！