Jury --- your peers!!

They don't need any training. If one is too stupid to
understand and use the system, there is no one to
blame but himself/herself.

OJ trial is a perfect example to show the fairness
of U.S. justice system. He would be convicted in
almost any other system. You can say that he is rich,
but do you think he has more money than the county,
state? A black man can avoid conviction when a white
woman was killed and with so much evidence speaks
load than what you have to say.

Here is a question for you. Who determines what is
justice?

所有跟帖： 

• 回复：Jury --- your peers!! -OJhadmoney- ♀ (398 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 08:57:35

• Rodney King get away with $MM -???!!!???- ♀ (398 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 09:50:12

• 讲话要有依据，不要瞎猜 -热情以被你耗尽- ♀ (398 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 09:47:13

• 我讲的是指刑事案。民案我不清楚。 -热情以被你耗尽- ♀ (398 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 09:50:04

• 刑事案的程序只比民事复杂，不会简单。民事案我都没见过走过场 -就完的- ♀ (32 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 18:13:43

• 被告有和控方同样的机会对陪审团解释案情，我过手的案子还没见过 -走过场就完呢- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 18:09:47