反歌森的个例

个例，尤其是未经证实的个例，不应该用于判断一种疗法是否有效。比如下面一个个例
就是反歌森的：


My dead friend Yvonne chose to treat her uterine cancer naturally at age 51 rather than following the advice of multiple MD's to get a hysterectomy. She eventually wound up at the Gerson clinic in Mexico, coffee enemas and all. She continued the treatment at home and shortly thereafter died in a 'regular' hospital, where at least I hope her pain was controlled. By this point, there was nothing they could do. The cancer had spread to her rectum and also affected her internal organs. Who knows if the caffeine in the enemas caused the cancer to spread even faster. Yeah, so, RIP Yvonne. No doubt your hu*****and and son miss you very much. I am the only female in my family w/o cancer, but if God forbid I am ever diagnosed I will not be going to Mexico for treatment and/or putting coffee up my butthole.

所有跟帖： 

• Amazon里成百上千上说他的疗法有效的评论怎们不拿出来？ -tournier- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/02/2014 postreply 08:02:03

• 所以要有双盲的统计数据才有说服力 -whoareyou- ♂ (131 bytes) () 06/02/2014 postreply 08:07:00

• 问题是统计的东西弄虚作假的空间很大，所有被FDA下架的西药都是据说经过了双盲统计的对不对？ -医者意也- ♂ (100 bytes) () 06/02/2014 postreply 08:30:59

• 不是统计弄虚作假作假， 而是怎么看待统计数据本身和怎样采集统计数据是关键， -陌上花开缓缓行- ♀ (197 bytes) () 06/02/2014 postreply 08:53:03

• 那是你个人的看法而已。 -医者意也- ♂ (112 bytes) () 06/02/2014 postreply 08:56:44

• 你是中医才这么说， 你更有偏向性。而我既不是中医也不是西医， 更中立。 -陌上花开缓缓行- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/02/2014 postreply 09:05:34

• 化疗背后有巨大的利益驱动，这是事实，不需要中医或西医的背景都可以了解的事实。 -医者意也- ♂ (90 bytes) () 06/02/2014 postreply 09:10:12

• 他们的观点贴，没有你偏激， 可以相信多点。 对你的技术贴， 我很尊重， -陌上花开缓缓行- ♀ (18 bytes) () 06/02/2014 postreply 09:12:16

• 原来把人称为精神病和疯狂世界的人反而就不偏激了，很好，很好。。 -医者意也- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/02/2014 postreply 09:16:26

• 哈哈。没人说那两人是疯狂和精神病吧。 -陌上花开缓缓行- ♀ (40 bytes) () 06/02/2014 postreply 09:19:03

• 你我立场不同，多说也无用。 -医者意也- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/02/2014 postreply 09:23:38

• 说服别人，传达自己的观点信念时候，且勿走极端。 -陌上花开缓缓行- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/02/2014 postreply 09:25:12

• 希望不要用双重标准。 -医者意也- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/02/2014 postreply 09:29:31