作为一个在Quant Finance工作过多年的,送你一段话

本帖于 2025-09-06 13:10:45 时间, 由版主 lionhill 编辑
回答: 也说控制Drawdownjenning2025-09-06 12:57:10

In hindsight, exceptional backtest performance is never that exceptional. A client once told me that he had never seen a backtest that didn’t work. He joked that the only people who can consistently generate Sharpe ratios of 3.0 or above were quants running backtests, and Bernie Madoff. Even when there’s no data mining, i.e. no explicit look-ahead bias, researchers benefit from years of published research on what works and what doesn’t, which is an implicit look-ahead bias. 

Backtests can be useful, but use them carefully. 

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!