That's why I put up the original table, it has the stats(CI, et

来源: weston 于 2012-02-04 13:27:11 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : 0 (81 bytes)
回答: It's better to read the original article. 由 超级吃货 于 2012-02-04 13:14:30

way when favorable reports for vegetabarians were posted? I didn't see it.

所有跟帖： 

• The authors' observations and conclusions: -超级吃货- ♂ 给 超级吃货 发送悄悄话 (9028 bytes) () 02/04/2012 postreply 14:04:51

• I read it and provided the link to the original article. -weston- ♀ 给 weston 发送悄悄话 weston 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/04/2012 postreply 16:03:13

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！