Some of your interpretations of the data are too simplified.You have to look at the strength of the statistics to draw conclusions.
It's better to read the original article.
所有跟帖:
• That's why I put up the original table, it has the stats(CI, et -weston- ♀ (81 bytes) () 02/04/2012 postreply 13:27:11
• The authors' observations and conclusions: -超级吃货- ♂ (9028 bytes) () 02/04/2012 postreply 14:04:51
• I read it and provided the link to the original article. -weston- ♀ (0 bytes) () 02/04/2012 postreply 16:03:13