Some of your interpretations of the data are too simplified.You have to look at the strength of the statistics to draw conclusions.
It's better to read the original article.
所有跟帖:
•
That's why I put up the original table, it has the stats(CI, et
-weston-
♀
(81 bytes)
()
02/04/2012 postreply
13:27:11
•
The authors' observations and conclusions:
-超级吃货-
♂
(9028 bytes)
()
02/04/2012 postreply
14:04:51
•
I read it and provided the link to the original article.
-weston-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
02/04/2012 postreply
16:03:13