It's better to read the original article.

Some of your interpretations of the data are too simplified.You have to look at the strength of the statistics to draw conclusions.

所有跟帖: 

That's why I put up the original table, it has the stats(CI, et -weston- 给 weston 发送悄悄话 weston 的博客首页 (81 bytes) () 02/04/2012 postreply 13:27:11

The authors' observations and conclusions: -超级吃货- 给 超级吃货 发送悄悄话 (9028 bytes) () 02/04/2012 postreply 14:04:51

I read it and provided the link to the original article. -weston- 给 weston 发送悄悄话 weston 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/04/2012 postreply 16:03:13

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!