I am speechless with this price

First thing is, I don't want myself to get stuck in this kind of decision making because it's very brutal. Of course, the general guideline is that if you buy for primary residence, you shall buy the biggest house possible. However, in California's case, the situation is too brutal, following the general guideline will at least make myself uncomfortable if I were you. That's why I don't want to get stuck in such difficult decision making. 1.4M stuck in one house is simply too much money in one place. If I were you, I probably won't be able to find a good answer myself. In fact, no body can answer your question accurately because in California, most conventional rules or guidelines don't apply. Bayfamily's suggestion may make sense, at least to me if I were you, but I am not you :-) Good luck

所有跟帖： 

• 说的好. -shn888- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/03/2007 postreply 14:52:00

• 呵呵，一有机会就鼓捣我们搬到你那去 -bayfamily- ♀ (78 bytes) () 05/03/2007 postreply 14:57:23

• This may be the best advice you'll ever get, seriously -miat42- ♂ (423 bytes) () 05/03/2007 postreply 15:01:11

• 完全同意 -bayfamily- ♀ (708 bytes) () 05/03/2007 postreply 15:17:00

• Totally understood :-) -miat42- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/03/2007 postreply 15:23:38

• 还有一条 -bayfamily- ♀ (114 bytes) () 05/03/2007 postreply 15:36:48

• East coast are not bad in terms of fairness to Asians -miat42- ♂ (45 bytes) () 05/03/2007 postreply 16:07:27

• hehe, -BayFamily- ♀ (113 bytes) () 05/03/2007 postreply 16:15:25

• I bet it is :-) or afraid of new environment, understandable -miat42- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/03/2007 postreply 16:21:51

• Concept of "non-linearity" and cashflow -miat42- ♂ (1462 bytes) () 05/03/2007 postreply 15:13:40

• 谢谢啦 -BayFamily- ♀ (143 bytes) () 05/03/2007 postreply 15:24:52