长期持有 is ok for an average person who expects average

return (loss). But for those who claim they can see future better than average, why didn't they follow their own predictions?

所有跟帖： 

• Well, that is a question I do not have answer. :) -山高月小- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/18/2008 postreply 07:21:11

• I bought my first house in early 90s. Is it long enough term? -miat42- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/18/2008 postreply 07:22:15

• I don't have any problem with long term holding. -屋漏痕- ♂ (139 bytes) () 09/18/2008 postreply 07:38:20

• That's because you get positive rental income that pays down -miat42- ♂ (344 bytes) () 09/18/2008 postreply 07:43:03

• If you had sold a year or two ago, you could buy back -屋漏痕- ♂ (126 bytes) () 09/18/2008 postreply 07:55:42

• Time shall be spent creating more positive cash flows than -miat42- ♂ (364 bytes) () 09/18/2008 postreply 08:10:36

• Let me ask you this. -屋漏痕- ♂ (134 bytes) () 09/18/2008 postreply 08:36:20

• No, I don't waste time dealing with such offers, first -miat42- ♂ (903 bytes) () 09/18/2008 postreply 08:42:28

• Nobody will mak you such an offer NOW, but -屋漏痕- ♂ (358 bytes) () 09/18/2008 postreply 09:01:19

• I am not a day trader on housing... -miat42- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/18/2008 postreply 09:25:45

• If you still don't understand, let me explain: -miat42- ♂ (807 bytes) () 09/18/2008 postreply 08:34:51

• "That's easier said than done." -屋漏痕- ♂ (39 bytes) () 09/18/2008 postreply 08:40:29

• Time shall be spent on long term positioning in real estate -miat42- ♂ (224 bytes) () 09/18/2008 postreply 08:44:48

• 回复："That's easier said than done." -funca- ♂ (342 bytes) () 09/18/2008 postreply 09:26:24

• Exactly what I meant. You can only be roughly right -miat42- ♂ (458 bytes) () 09/18/2008 postreply 09:44:54