hmmm,大痴子文采的确8错!那你到底怎么看待Clinton造成的"繁荣"。。

来源: 戏雨飞鹰 2009-03-18 18:08:42 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (616 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ 戏雨飞鹰 ] 在 2009-03-18 18:58:06 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.
hmmm,大痴子文采的确8错!那你到底怎么看待Clinton造成的"繁荣"。。

很多经济学家可认那是一种" Fake Prosperity", caused
by the "trickle down" Voodoo economic model,which was destined to fail because it was built on a fiction.

(zt)Prosperity is not possible when workers are not fairly compensated and wealth is not equitably distributed. Our focus should be on creating a system that is sustainable, which means that the needs of workers should take precedent over those of Wall Street.

what do you think about it?

是不是我问的问题又太早? hehehe

enjoy your trip, 痴子:)

所有跟帖: 

谢谢您的支持 :) -idiot94- 给 idiot94 发送悄悄话 idiot94 的博客首页 (257 bytes) () 03/18/2009 postreply 18:49:12

oh,那是我用词不当,应该说: -戏雨飞鹰- 给 戏雨飞鹰 发送悄悄话 戏雨飞鹰 的博客首页 (73 bytes) () 03/18/2009 postreply 19:06:25

IMHO, Clinton's economic growth was still indeed -idiot94- 给 idiot94 发送悄悄话 idiot94 的博客首页 (335 bytes) () 03/18/2009 postreply 19:20:45

well said! thanks. -戏雨飞鹰- 给 戏雨飞鹰 发送悄悄话 戏雨飞鹰 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/19/2009 postreply 05:50:10

谁说克林顿不好我跟谁急,阿! -贫论元- 给 贫论元 发送悄悄话 (268 bytes) () 03/19/2009 postreply 10:47:26

克林顿缺乏远见。 -endofsuburbia- 给 endofsuburbia 发送悄悄话 endofsuburbia 的博客首页 (190 bytes) () 03/19/2009 postreply 11:37:49

Let's see how Bill Clinton defended for himself for what respon -戏雨飞鹰- 给 戏雨飞鹰 发送悄悄话 戏雨飞鹰 的博客首页 (1800 bytes) () 03/19/2009 postreply 12:21:01

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”