No.

Constitution says: 

Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct. 

以前不仅数公民，还数奴隶。如果没有奴隶，宪法规定是要按“free Person”数，而不是citizen。

所有跟帖： 

• 宪法定的时候国家还未成立当然数自由人而不是公民。但是当国家成立后这个自由人就应该自然指的是公民了。否则 -桃花源主- ♂ (80 bytes) () 07/15/2019 postreply 20:53:13

• 条文规定是以后每十年要数一次，什么国家未成立？狡辩啊 -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ (0 bytes) () 07/16/2019 postreply 03:16:51

• 那为什么公民有投票权而非自由人有投票权 -桃花源主- ♂ (0 bytes) () 07/16/2019 postreply 04:10:46

• 公民不一定有投票权，有投票权不一定是公民。 -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ (1287 bytes) () 07/16/2019 postreply 05:50:50

• 历史上蓄奴是合法，那要不要现在也当成合法？亏你还是法律专业的，搬历史来说话 -ecolio157h7- ♂ (129 bytes) () 07/16/2019 postreply 13:18:06

• 我没有提倡非公民选举，宪法说人口统计要算所有人。请不要随便歪曲。 -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ (0 bytes) () 07/16/2019 postreply 16:45:20

• 川普加个公民问题也是算所有人啊，即统计公民有多少，也统计总人数多少 -ecolio157h7- ♂ (62 bytes) () 07/16/2019 postreply 17:49:44

• 禁止蓄奴需要宪法13修正案，你有本事你也去通过一个人口统计修正案。不懂法律不要随便假设。 -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ (0 bytes) () 07/16/2019 postreply 16:46:18

• "那为什么公民有投票权而非自由人有投票权",他这句话什么意思？ -笑薇.- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/16/2019 postreply 10:27:55

• Reply -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ (772 bytes) () 07/16/2019 postreply 10:52:47

• 回應 -單身老貓- ♂ (1405 bytes) () 07/16/2019 postreply 06:10:48

• 关键是宪法定的时候，公民制度建立了么？有护照，证件，户籍等等证明公民吗？ -桃花源主- ♂ (0 bytes) () 07/16/2019 postreply 19:53:49

• 回應 -單身老貓- ♂ (160 bytes) () 07/16/2019 postreply 21:55:59