回复：请教： 取消阻房合同

you are just rescinding the contract, which did not cause any damages to her.  She has no rights to ask for any unpaid rent.  Even if the court takes the case, it would only either announce the contract to be rescinded or decide that you repudiated the contract.  Even if you repudiated the contract, she did not pay the deposit and did not reasonably reply on your contract,and did not suffer any damages, while u did not profit from repudiating the contract, therefore, there will be no damages.  

You can tell her that 1)she did not pay the desposit, therefore, she is the party who repudiated the damages first, and as a result, the contract is void. 2) even if it is you who repudiated the contract, she cannot get any damages . 

所有跟帖： 

• 人家就隔夜的时间，哪有可能付定金，不合理嘛 -用户名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/09/2013 postreply 17:43:00

• 如果她拿出一堆单据，说自己已经付了谁谁搬家费，买/卖了多少家具，预定了这个那个，怎么办？ -用户名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/09/2013 postreply 17:43:55

• 只要证明麽得地方住了，只好住旅馆，或更贵的地方。 -jin_yin_hua- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/09/2013 postreply 17:49:59

• 回复：人家就隔夜的时间，哪有可能付定金，不合理嘛 -idoubtitit- ♀ (142 bytes) () 01/09/2013 postreply 18:03:18

• 原文里写明了没有你说的那些条款，签字后这是份binding的合同，只有在合理时间内不付钱才算违约 -用户名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/09/2013 postreply 18:08:19

• 回复：原文里写明了没有你说的那些条款，签字后这是份binding的合同，只有在合理时间内不付钱才算违约 -idoubtitit- ♀ (408 bytes) () 01/09/2013 postreply 18:11:19

• 等老猫才裁判！！哈哈 -用户名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/09/2013 postreply 18:13:10

• K, nite! -idoubtitit- ♀ (0 bytes) () 01/09/2013 postreply 18:15:15

• 回复：回复：原文里写明了没有你说的那些条款，签字后这是份binding的合同，只有在合理时间内不付钱才算违约 -apt- ♂ (276 bytes) () 01/09/2013 postreply 20:29:31

• 回复：回复：回复：原文里写明了没有你说的那些条款，签字后这是份binding的合同，只有在合理时间内不付钱才算违约 -idoubtitit- ♀ (88 bytes) () 01/10/2013 postreply 10:46:16

• 每个州都有自己的rental regulation. 这些都有既定公式可以套。我读到的都说随便违约会有惩罚。 -用户名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/10/2013 postreply 11:49:07

• 我个人觉得这个问题不能完全用法律的眼光来看问题. -CyberCat- ♂ (109 bytes) () 01/10/2013 postreply 12:56:43

• 大城市的话未必告，说不定有arbitration之类的 -用户名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/10/2013 postreply 17:19:33