回复：原文里写明了没有你说的那些条款，签字后这是份binding的合同，只有在合理时间内不付钱才算违约

The announcement of not being able to perform before the performance starts is not breaching the contract, it is repudiation instead.  Usually for the injured party to get damages, they must prove their loss or the repudiating party's profit resulting from the repudiation.  The future tenant here can prove none. She cannot get damages and the contract will be rescinded by the court. 

所有跟帖： 

• 等老猫才裁判！！哈哈 -用户名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/09/2013 postreply 18:13:10

• K, nite! -idoubtitit- ♀ (0 bytes) () 01/09/2013 postreply 18:15:15

• 回复：回复：原文里写明了没有你说的那些条款，签字后这是份binding的合同，只有在合理时间内不付钱才算违约 -apt- ♂ (276 bytes) () 01/09/2013 postreply 20:29:31

• 回复：回复：回复：原文里写明了没有你说的那些条款，签字后这是份binding的合同，只有在合理时间内不付钱才算违约 -idoubtitit- ♀ (88 bytes) () 01/10/2013 postreply 10:46:16

• 每个州都有自己的rental regulation. 这些都有既定公式可以套。我读到的都说随便违约会有惩罚。 -用户名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/10/2013 postreply 11:49:07

• 我个人觉得这个问题不能完全用法律的眼光来看问题. -CyberCat- ♂ (109 bytes) () 01/10/2013 postreply 12:56:43

• 大城市的话未必告，说不定有arbitration之类的 -用户名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/10/2013 postreply 17:19:33