That is what I don't understand, it seems taxed twice from this

来源: meowi 于 2015-03-31 10:42:31 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (0 bytes)

所有跟帖： 

• from this case, the calculation -meowi- ♀ 给 meowi 发送悄悄话 (319 bytes) () 03/31/2015 postreply 10:53:34

• remember for the recapped depreciation, ... -njrookie- ♂ 给 njrookie 发送悄悄话 njrookie 的博客首页 (78 bytes) () 03/31/2015 postreply 11:08:31

• thank you njrookie, please one more question below -meowi- ♀ 给 meowi 发送悄悄话 (514 bytes) () 03/31/2015 postreply 11:42:55

• I find another case, it was done another way -meowi- ♀ 给 meowi 发送悄悄话 (640 bytes) () 03/31/2015 postreply 11:52:19

• I think your second computation correct -njrookie- ♂ 给 njrookie 发送悄悄话 njrookie 的博客首页 (311 bytes) () 03/31/2015 postreply 11:53:25

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！