三位流行病学专家10月4日提出大巴林顿宣言,倡议立即改变防疫政策

来源: TBz 2020-10-10 12:59:27 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (20937 bytes)

哈佛、牛津和斯坦福三位顶级流行病专家10月4日提出大伯林顿宣言,倡议立即改变防疫政策,实施重点保护高危人群的策略,低危人群全面放开,实现群体免疫。宣言书这几天已获得近七千医学专家,近一万五千医务工作者和二十万公众人士联署。

宣言指出,由于封闭式防疫所造成的其它不可挽回的损失,如错过流感疫苗,心血管疾病延误治疗,癌症早期诊断等,已经大于疫情本身的危害。日前世卫组织估算,全球已有10%的人口感染。洪水已经形成,靠堵是堵不住的。世卫组织同时也宣布,目前病毒主要是通过无症状感染者传播。无症状感染者传播的病毒,自然倾向于无症状感染。病毒随着传播而毒性降低传播性增强,既符合科学规律,又已被数据证明。比如高校开学以来,学生已出现7万多例阳性,但需住院的只有四人,死亡一人。正如宣言中写的,对低危人群,新冠病毒的危险性已经低于流感。整个宣言只字未提经济社会方面的利害,仅仅考虑医学上的取舍。

https://gbdeclaration.org/

The Great Barrington Declaration

The Great Barrington Declaration – As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection. 

Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice. 

Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed.

Fortunately, our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza. 

As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e.  the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity. 

The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection. 

Adopting measures to protect the vulnerable should be the central aim of public health responses to COVID-19. By way of example, nursing homes should use staff with acquired immunity and perform frequent PCR testing of other staff and all visitors. Staff rotation should be minimized. Retired people living at home should have groceries and other essentials delivered to their home. When possible, they should meet family members outside rather than inside. A comprehensive and detailed list of measures, including approaches to multi-generational households, can be implemented, and is well within the scope and capability of public health professionals. 

Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal. Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practiced by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold. Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home. Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.

On October 4, 2020, this declaration was authored and signed in Great Barrington, United States, by:

Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring of infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations.

Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases.

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert focusing on infectious diseases and vulnerable populations.

 

所有跟帖: 

中危咋办? -lucky_rain- 给 lucky_rain 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/10/2020 postreply 13:12:26

打疫苗,得病了有双抗,还有那“希望“ -fuz- 给 fuz 发送悄悄话 fuz 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/10/2020 postreply 14:29:39

这不就是网友solo1提出的“反向隔离”么? -fuz- 给 fuz 发送悄悄话 fuz 的博客首页 (139 bytes) () 10/10/2020 postreply 13:13:30

就是。我给Science的文章比这个更详细。迟早会有更多的人想通了。就怕病毒到时候变异了,就晚了。 -solo1- 给 solo1 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/10/2020 postreply 14:11:50

可惜文章被编辑直接拒了。 -solo1- 给 solo1 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/10/2020 postreply 14:16:26

名望啊,还是特别重要的。看看那三位在哪公干的,哈牛屎啊 -fuz- 给 fuz 发送悄悄话 fuz 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/10/2020 postreply 14:32:05

哈牛屎, 哈哈 -数与形- 给 数与形 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/10/2020 postreply 17:31:59

就是英国最先提出的群体免疫法。英国基本是这样做的,瑞典也是。结果如何不是都可以看到吗。 -阿明.- 给 阿明. 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/10/2020 postreply 18:42:41

任何计划和策略实施都存在“时机”问题,就跟治病用药一样,即便同样药,用药时机也决定结果和利弊。 -pickshell- 给 pickshell 发送悄悄话 (464 bytes) () 10/11/2020 postreply 03:53:28

以色列早就实行这个策略。觉得 “重点隔离” ,或 “特定群体隔离” 的说法比 “反向隔离” 更贴切。 -欲千北- 给 欲千北 发送悄悄话 欲千北 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/10/2020 postreply 16:02:16

以色列正在封城啊:“遇第二波疫情 以色列将封城三周 ” -阿明.- 给 阿明. 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/10/2020 postreply 19:01:59

到现在这时候了,事情其实比较容易做了。 -吃与活- 给 吃与活 发送悄悄话 吃与活 的博客首页 (197 bytes) () 10/10/2020 postreply 17:15:51

世界早该如此,疫苗也快出来了,还是很有希望的,带风向的抄作业的让他们自己内循环去 -小落- 给 小落 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/10/2020 postreply 18:01:00

在疫苗快出来的时候来这个倡议, 哎, 我真替这些"专家"脸红. -POCOCAT- 给 POCOCAT 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/10/2020 postreply 18:44:25

俄国疫苗出来几个月了,现在第二波比第一波还厉害。看不出疫苗的作用。 -阿明.- 给 阿明. 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/10/2020 postreply 18:57:26

病毒浓度那么高,高危怎么保护,就是牺牲人命换经济。不止中国,我们这(澳新)病毒也基本没了 -niersi- 给 niersi 发送悄悄话 niersi 的博客首页 (58 bytes) () 10/10/2020 postreply 18:56:29

澳新防疫怎么做到病毒基本没了的?也是戴口罩+严格隔离?民众能听从政府步调一致吗? -香草仙子- 给 香草仙子 发送悄悄话 香草仙子 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/11/2020 postreply 07:34:15

是,还没中国严格,思路一样。两周就少一大半,四周就基本没了。违反的罚款. -niersi- 给 niersi 发送悄悄话 niersi 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/11/2020 postreply 14:58:52

今天美国的新添感染人数已经是53120,说是已经超迷了4月份的峰值,只希望死亡率下降。 -长青311- 给 长青311 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/10/2020 postreply 20:12:00

小题大作,将检测阳性的人隔离就可以啦 -难得糊涂一次- 给 难得糊涂一次 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/10/2020 postreply 21:53:10

美国感染人数是八百万,老年人是数千万,保护老年人容易呢还是隔离感染人容易? -难得糊涂一次- 给 难得糊涂一次 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/11/2020 postreply 09:26:08

隔离感染人最长造成14天失业而已 -难得糊涂一次- 给 难得糊涂一次 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/11/2020 postreply 09:27:50

保护老年人可是没有尽头的事 -难得糊涂一次- 给 难得糊涂一次 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/11/2020 postreply 09:28:22

在美国很难做到 -TBz- 给 TBz 发送悄悄话 TBz 的博客首页 (251 bytes) () 10/11/2020 postreply 09:46:35

早期加州刚开始有病例的时候,我们这里的市政府发来一个邮件,因为不少居民在问,我们这个城市有无病例? -虎嗅蔷薇- 给 虎嗅蔷薇 发送悄悄话 (496 bytes) () 10/11/2020 postreply 10:31:11

哈哈,还真是。当初提议封城隔离,不少人出来示威抗议“限制自由,侵犯人权”:) -pickshell- 给 pickshell 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/11/2020 postreply 11:09:46

武汉封城与我的计划不一样 -难得糊涂一次- 给 难得糊涂一次 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/11/2020 postreply 11:15:04

只是十四天有什么难的 -难得糊涂一次- 给 难得糊涂一次 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/11/2020 postreply 11:13:57

保护高危人群是一件很难的事。 -hydrop- 给 hydrop 发送悄悄话 (395 bytes) () 10/11/2020 postreply 20:27:11

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!