Sorry wrong info.

来源: 26484915 于 2014-10-02 13:19:46 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (286 bytes)

Here are the American Cancer Society’s estimates for melanoma in the United States for 2014:
About 76,100 new melanomas will be diagnosed (about 43,890 in men and 32,210 in women).
About 9,710 people are expected to die of melanoma (about 6,470 men and 3,240 women).

所有跟帖： 

• Does it prove or disprove the 2% annual increase in melanoma bro -Lily168- ♀ 给 Lily168 发送悄悄话 Lily168 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 13:24:43

• That's not the point. The key is relationship with sunscreens. -26484915- ♂ 给 26484915 发送悄悄话 26484915 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 13:36:58

• So do your data prove or disprove the link to the use of sunscre -Lily168- ♀ 给 Lily168 发送悄悄话 Lily168 的博客首页 (76 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 13:39:50

• Data indicates sunscreens cut melanoma risk significantly. -26484915- ♂ 给 26484915 发送悄悄话 26484915 的博客首页 (2599 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 13:41:22

• Any data about the increase or the decrease of sunscreen use in -Lily168- ♀ 给 Lily168 发送悄悄话 Lily168 的博客首页 (65 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 13:46:47

• the same time period? -Lily168- ♀ 给 Lily168 发送悄悄话 Lily168 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 13:48:29

• You have to ask him. It's his point. -26484915- ♂ 给 26484915 发送悄悄话 26484915 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 13:50:13

• Here are a couple of links -Lily168- ♀ 给 Lily168 发送悄悄话 Lily168 的博客首页 (1049 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 15:01:08

• Thanks for the info. To prove correlation, we'll need to look at -26484915- ♂ 给 26484915 发送悄悄话 26484915 的博客首页 (41 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 15:23:16

• Is your point then without the use of the sunscreen melanoma cas -Lily168- ♀ 给 Lily168 发送悄悄话 Lily168 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 13:41:34

• Are you saying you agree with the op that sunscreen caused the i -26484915- ♂ 给 26484915 发送悄悄话 26484915 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 13:44:43

• The increase? -26484915- ♂ 给 26484915 发送悄悄话 26484915 的博客首页 (33 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 13:46:01

• I did not read his original post the same way you do. -Lily168- ♀ 给 Lily168 发送悄悄话 Lily168 的博客首页 (528 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 14:23:47

• My impression is that his rebuttal is far from scientific. -26484915- ♂ 给 26484915 发送悄悄话 26484915 的博客首页 (185 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 14:44:18

• Are you sure it's not the increased uv exposure -26484915- ♂ 给 26484915 发送悄悄话 26484915 的博客首页 (44 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 13:48:21

• The aad.org site offers this explanation: -26484915- ♂ 给 26484915 发送悄悄话 26484915 的博客首页 (1008 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 13:55:01

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！