我就如同你那位朋友,咋一看就轻易就否定了这种说法,只是没有发言

来源: 吃与活 2022-12-22 08:21:39 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (1020 bytes)

看了你的回帖,才查了一下,果然有道理。至于如何针对这一点治疗,我没有见解。

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8647725/

“Summing up, it seems reasonable to conclude that additional charges may implicate three important consequences:

  1. The increase of the long-range electrostatic interactions of positive parts of SARS-CoV-2 with the negatively charged receptor ACE2 on the surface of the host cells.
  2. The increase of the interaction of the region S1/S2 with negatively charged furin enzyme catalyzing protein S cleavage. Inhibition of the action of positively charged antibodies.
  3. Inhibition of the action of positively charged antibodies

The above can seriously enhance the toxicity of the virus.”

所有跟帖: 

这篇好,谢谢。我当时查了一下,没查到你给的这篇。只找到S蛋白氨基酸突变的信息。看来我的查找技术要提高。 -欲千北- 给 欲千北 发送悄悄话 欲千北 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/22/2022 postreply 08:32:38

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”