回复：回复：回复：thank you.

Thank you.

Your suggestion is very good.(your writing and logic is excellent too:))

I guess it would be better for him to move back to DEF.(btw, what is the difference between Design for test and Design? or even back to layout? or design? Is it possible? I remember he mentioned he worked on the testing for design before. He said that is much easier work.

I think workload gets heavier along the flow chart, because people in the end have to find and correct the errors people in the front have made.

The only question left is to how to move to the front then. Sigh.

所有跟帖： 

• Typo, that's DFT (design for test) -tank- ♂ (301 bytes) () 11/05/2006 postreply 11:49:35

• 回复：Typo, that's DFT (design for test) -baylife- ♀ (177 bytes) () 11/05/2006 postreply 11:55:34

• ur husband has better answer than mine here. -tank- ♂ (94 bytes) () 11/05/2006 postreply 12:04:35

• You are right. Thanks. -baylife- ♀ (63 bytes) () 11/05/2006 postreply 12:12:27

• tank is extremely knowledgeable! -noid123- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/08/2006 postreply 21:34:23