Recently there is a topic in this forum regarding sustainable economic growth of China. This is an interesting topic that I think worth further discussion.
Will the economic boom of China be able to continue until she becomes an advanced country??
During the late 80’s and late 90’s I spent my time playing money games in Thailand, Malaysia, and Singapore. Some of you here might still remember that economy of Malaysia and Thailand were booming at that time, and the whole world (well, almost) was predicting this region (Asia-Pacific excluding China and Japan) will become the 4th economic power in the 21th century, after USA, EU, and Japan. But just within 3 months in the mid 1997, most of the foreign investments within this region were pulling out, during which the financial crisis happened. By that time every aspect of these countries remain the same, the retreated foreign investors just wanted to find a better investment place for lower product cost sake. That’s why the foreign investments come to China.
We all know that the recent economic boom of China is purely due to the huge foreign investments, and the investors are predicting China will become a economic superpower in this century. All these things look and sound familiar to me. My concern is, will the foreign capitals go to other places once the production cost in China reaches the level of Thailand and Malaysia? If the answer is yes, does China foresee it and is finding the solutions to sustain the economic boom?
Are the Chinese really 盲目乐观
所有跟帖:
•
外资的投入只是小部分
-你真是庸人自扰-
♀
(44 bytes)
()
08/24/2005 postreply
06:49:20
•
外资的投入是大部分
-upsidedown-
♀
(246 bytes)
()
08/24/2005 postreply
06:56:18
•
回复:外资的投入是大部分
-你真是庸人自扰-
♀
(281 bytes)
()
08/24/2005 postreply
07:09:46
•
jump out from text books
-upsidedown-
♀
(150 bytes)
()
08/24/2005 postreply
07:31:09
•
你自己都说不清楚,怎么
-convince人家-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/24/2005 postreply
07:55:02
•
lazy to explain
-upsidedown-
♀
(108 bytes)
()
08/24/2005 postreply
08:04:21
•
回复:回复:外资的投入是大部分
-aegis-
♀
(243 bytes)
()
08/24/2005 postreply
10:27:14
•
扩大内需,中国人过上美国人的日子, 能源哪里来?
-beavisssss-
♀
(10 bytes)
()
08/24/2005 postreply
07:28:50
•
neclear power.wind power
-solarpower-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/24/2005 postreply
10:46:02
•
you are kidding rite
-butt-head0-
♀
(8 bytes)
()
08/24/2005 postreply
12:44:05
•
没问题,中国人多B多能生, 成本高不了
-beaviss-
♀
(24 bytes)
()
08/24/2005 postreply
07:08:00
•
To Africa
-upsidedown-
♀
(263 bytes)
()
08/24/2005 postreply
07:26:34
•
it is certainly a wrong
-predicatio-
♀
(34 bytes)
()
08/24/2005 postreply
07:59:28
•
回复:Are the Chinese really 盲目乐观??
-ChineseEco-
♀
(837 bytes)
()
08/24/2005 postreply
07:16:56
•
Your point is resonable
-beavisssss-
♀
(195 bytes)
()
08/24/2005 postreply
07:27:17
•
I agree with your points
-soundsrite-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/24/2005 postreply
08:27:01
•
You are totally
-wrong!!-
♀
(131 bytes)
()
08/24/2005 postreply
11:16:38
•
you are wrong
-hg1001-
♀
(65 bytes)
()
08/25/2005 postreply
03:13:45
•
My opinion
-borisg-
♀
(1977 bytes)
()
08/24/2005 postreply
07:35:10
•
my prediction
-upsidedown-
♀
(331 bytes)
()
08/24/2005 postreply
07:49:36
•
回复:my prediction
-aegis-
♀
(112 bytes)
()
08/24/2005 postreply
10:19:32
•
not really
-hg1001-
♀
(311 bytes)
()
08/25/2005 postreply
03:19:05
•
回复:Are the Chinese really 盲目乐观??
-aegis-
♀
(278 bytes)
()
08/24/2005 postreply
10:24:07
•
when average Chinese income
-reach1/7us-
♀
(208 bytes)
()
08/24/2005 postreply
10:53:45
•
should be 1/4.which is 9000
-usdpercap-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/24/2005 postreply
11:22:51
•
Don't be superficial
-upsidedown-
♀
(999 bytes)
()
08/25/2005 postreply
03:09:15
•
回复:Don't be superficial
-borisg-
♀
(1036 bytes)
()
08/25/2005 postreply
09:25:34
•
回复:Don't be superficial
-aegis-
♀
(529 bytes)
()
08/25/2005 postreply
09:45:44
•
回复:Don't be superficial
-aegis-
♀
(514 bytes)
()
08/25/2005 postreply
09:56:13
•
you know nothing
-upsidedown-
♀
(428 bytes)
()
08/26/2005 postreply
05:40:50
•
回复:Are the Chinese really 盲目乐观
-zheng_yuan-
♀
(903 bytes)
()
08/25/2005 postreply
14:38:43
•
A good choice CCP raise a war
-Leader-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/26/2005 postreply
20:06:14
•
Nuclear War, PLA Gen Zhu says
-RealWorld-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/26/2005 postreply
21:29:27
•
Mass destruction, long range
-SmartIdea-
♀
(47 bytes)
()
08/26/2005 postreply
21:33:12
•
One stone for two birds
-TGTT-
♀
(472 bytes)
()
08/26/2005 postreply
21:44:45
•
准备西安以东的所有城市被摧毁
-西安以西-
♀
(214 bytes)
()
08/26/2005 postreply
21:51:05
•
党的命运与整个世界的命运捆绑,如果共产党完中国就完世界就完了
-要死大家死到一起-
♀
(917 bytes)
()
08/26/2005 postreply
22:29:01
•
你不会写汉字啊?真想挺死你Ya
-龟头正挺-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/26/2005 postreply
04:04:05
•
你的英语怎么这么差阿。还是用中文写吧。
-还是用中文写吧。-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/26/2005 postreply
19:52:02
•
一帖多少银子?回复:你的英语怎么这么差阿。还是用中文写吧。
-做帖的是-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/26/2005 postreply
20:03:09