Given what it is where it is, whatever compromise can be accepted by BOTH parties.
In the future, whether they still want to partner together under the same term, or write down better/different guideline upfront, change the deal, or not work together, is another choice.
The solution is
所有跟帖:
•
俺觉得他们之间心结有了,估计再合作就不会愉快了
-晓残-
♂
(81 bytes)
()
10/09/2013 postreply
09:05:04
•
依谁啊?按估价的木拿就觉得亏了(以后落了咋办?),按现金的拿方又觉的不值了。要不抓阉吧。。。
-MrsKwok-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
10/09/2013 postreply
09:06:54
•
This case is simple, long explanation short
-WQPY-
♂
(33 bytes)
()
10/09/2013 postreply
09:21:19
•
其实他们这样的合作模式开始就已经是在一个not fair的状态(资金投入不平均,一人3分2一人
-MrsKwok-
♀
(152 bytes)
()
10/09/2013 postreply
09:40:08
•
B 是神马冬冬,俺真的好愚笨,就跟听天书一样
-晓残-
♂
(55 bytes)
()
10/09/2013 postreply
09:47:29
•
15万的75%贷。。。
-MrsKwok-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
10/09/2013 postreply
09:50:35
•
A deal is a deal,
-WQPY-
♂
(650 bytes)
()
10/09/2013 postreply
10:00:22
•
W大高深,有点象刻在石壁上的武功绝学!lol...
-MrsKwok-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
10/09/2013 postreply
10:04:58
•
好,受教了
-晓残-
♂
(11 bytes)
()
10/09/2013 postreply
10:05:05
•
Put it this way
-WQPY-
♂
(469 bytes)
()
10/09/2013 postreply
10:22:31
•
俺突然想到另外一个办法,就是两人合作把钱全贷出来
-晓残-
♂
(245 bytes)
()
10/09/2013 postreply
10:32:04
•
信任的前提是完善的规则和尊重!不是想干嘛就干嘛的,额比较同意德易得,同意拿出15的75%
-MrsKwok-
♀
(23 bytes)
()
10/09/2013 postreply
10:58:51