很同情你，也很同情你的医生。

3. 我该追究该医生的责任吗? 该怎么跟她谈?

It depends on you.

做医生不容易。很多医生超负荷地工作，有时后休息不好还要上班，托着疲倦的身体还要工作，再好再仔细的医生也很难保证一辈子没有疏忽的时候。常在河边走，哪能不湿鞋？

像你这种案例，不是大的医疗事故。尽管看起来医生有错，你也不一定就肯定能赢。即使医生陪你也不会陪的很多。最后你可能觉得都不值得去惹那麻烦事。如果医生检查记录说你的副科检查正常，那么这个官司根本就不成立。

另外你自己要是没有遵守医嘱，如果医生有笔录的记录证实的话，那是你的错。比如医生让你三天后复查，你没去她的诊所，那你不能怪医生。

一下四点都具备，案例才能成立（Elements of the case）

1. A duty was owed - a legal duty exists whenever a hospital or health care provider undertakes care or treatment of a patient.

2. A duty was breached -- the provider failed to conform to the relevant standard of care. The standard of care is proved by expert testimony or by obvious errors (the doctrine of res ipsa loquitor or 'the thing speaks for itself').

3. The breach caused an injury -- The breach of duty was a proximate cause of the injury.

4. Damages -- Without damages (losses which may be pecuniary or emotional), there is no basis for a claim, regardless of whether the medical provider was negligent.

如果医生检查记录说你的副科检查正常，那么这个官司根本就不成立，因为一上的三和四都不存在。