最后一栏,如果P>0.1,就不要看那个结果了.结论在统计上没有意义.

所有跟帖： 

• 大家都知道膳食只是解释variable最多30%.Of course one expects to have higher -weston- ♀ (44 bytes) () 02/04/2012 postreply 16:00:59

• 所以才说0.1,否则一般的就以0.05为界了。你看文中解释的也是很多项目样本不足，不能说明问题 -Manymore- ♀ (0 bytes) () 02/04/2012 postreply 20:26:47

• In meta analysis for large scale study over many yrs, for fish -weston- ♀ (251 bytes) () 02/05/2012 postreply 00:20:55