Chinese law?

来源: wal-mart 2004-03-25 12:10:54 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (845 bytes)
Clearly, this law111 has no knowledge of China's family law, which provides that children have duties to support their elder parents. Please note the complicated nexus between laws, cultrues and traditions. China has a long tradition that parents raise children for later support purposes. The law-makers and enforcers cannot blind their eyes to this existing custom in the society, esp. where the goverment at the current stage is incapable of bearing the burden of supporting senior citizens through establishing a nationwide social security system.
Besides the issues of jurisdiction and conflict of laws, it rests with the court's discretion to entertain equity in order to resolve the dispute between two parties. It will be a tough judgment because the complainant did not fullfil her duties at law to foster her minor child either.

所有跟帖: 

回复:Chinese law? -law111- 给 law111 发送悄悄话 (873 bytes) () 03/25/2004 postreply 12:24:35

回复:回复:Chinese law? -wal-mart- 给 wal-mart 发送悄悄话 (768 bytes) () 03/25/2004 postreply 15:26:52

回复:回复:回复:Chinese law? -law111- 给 law111 发送悄悄话 (1230 bytes) () 03/25/2004 postreply 15:52:55

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”