回复:Chinese law?

来源: law111 2004-03-25 12:24:35 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (873 bytes)
You are right in stating the complexity of the case; not so speculating other's awareness of legal system difference between the two countries. Yet just because of the complexity that the defantant can cite for her failure of fulfilling her responsibilities and factual non-existence of that parent-child relationship, the case can go either way.

I hope you are addressing the important questions of culture tradition and the basic humanity / consiousness of all cultures: regardless of specific circumstances, we all need to use common sense and exercise our instinct of right and wrong in searching for a sensible solution. I don't consider the court proceeding the right way for this type of conflict. By the way, has both parties reached out for the other trying to understand instead of pursue the heartless course of action adding more salt on wounds?

所有跟帖: 

回复:回复:Chinese law? -wal-mart- 给 wal-mart 发送悄悄话 (768 bytes) () 03/25/2004 postreply 15:26:52

回复:回复:回复:Chinese law? -law111- 给 law111 发送悄悄话 (1230 bytes) () 03/25/2004 postreply 15:52:55

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”